Best Practice: Reducing family law writeoffs

Asked and Answered

By John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC

Q. I am the managing partner in a eight attorney firm in Nashville, Tennessee. We are exclusively a family law practice and while we charge a few clients on a flat fee basis - most clients are time billed. We ask for a $5000 security retainer up front. After the retainer is used we invoice clients for additional time spent on a monthly basis. We are having problems getting paid and are having to write off a large amount of accounts receivable. I would appreciate your thoughts.

A. This is a common problem that I hear from family law as well as other firms representing individuals. The law firm collects the initial retainer, the retainer is used up, additional work is done, - often to the conclusion of the matter - the client is invoiced for the remainder of the time expended, and the bill either does not get paid or is paid partially. The law firm ends up writing off the balance.

The best solution is to require the retainer be replenished at a certain point and, within your state's ethical parameters, not perform additional work until the additional retainer is received. Recently a client told me that his office manager's number one responsibility is a daily review of unbilled time compared to unused retainer. When the unbilled time gets to 90% used the client is invoiced for additional retainer. When 100% is reached work is stopped until the additional retainer is received.

With today's client billing systems that have integrated trust accounting, assuming that timesheets are entered directly and daily, an office manager or bookkeeper can simply print or review on screen a summary work in process report that shows for each matter the unbilled values for fees and costs, unpaid receivable, and retainer balances in the trust account. Matters with unbilled fees and costs approaching the retainer balance can then be invoiced for additional retainer. The key to making this work:

1. All timekeepers must enter their own time daily via direct time entry.

2. Someone must be assigned the responsibility for daily monitoring and daily invoicing for additional retainer replenishment.

Click here for our blog on financial management

Click here for articles on other topics

John W. Olmstead, MBA, Ph.D, CMC,(www.olmsteadassoc.com) is a past chair and member of the ISBA Standing Committee on Law Office Management and Economics. For more information on law office management please direct questions to the ISBA listserver, which John and other committee members review, or view archived copies of The Bottom Line Newsletters. Contact John at jolmstead@olmsteadassoc.com.

Posted on December 10, 2014 by Chris Bonjean
Filed under: 

Member Comments (1)

Note well the comment: "When the unbilled time gets to 90% used the client is invoiced for additional retainer. When 100% is reached work is stopped until the additional retainer is received."

The key is having that language crystal clear in the retainer agreement. Even then, statistics abound with correlations of the number of bar complaints or malpractice actions brought in response to attorney fee collection efforts.

Here in California we have a program to mitigate some of the above.
"The State Bar's Mandatory Fee Arbitration Program (MFA) is an informal, confidential and lower cost forum for resolving fee disputes between lawyers and their clients. MFA arbitration is mandatory for the lawyer if the client requests arbitration."(www.calbar.ca.gov/Attorneys/Member Services)

Nonetheless, having been there, done that, the way many clients rip off private practice attorneys is deplorable!

Login to post comments