Interested in joining your peers in the legal blogging world but don't have time to set up and maintain a blog of your own? LexBlog can help! Twenty is LexBlog's new and completely turnkey blogging platform. It is being offered to ISBA members as part of LexBlog's national #Blog4Good campaign, which aims to aggregate and showcase pandemic-related legal information.

Join us online from 11 a.m. until noon Thursday, June 18 to learn how to make your law firm thrive during the pandemic. Most law firms have responded to the crisis well, going virtual quicker than they thought possible and learning to manage a team remotely. They are surviving, which is good, but other firms are doing substantially better than surviving. In fact, some are now thriving and growing, despite operational limitations they couldn’t have imagined just three months ago. One of the differences between the surviving and the thriving law firms is that many of the thriving firms are using professional law firm coaches. This webinar will feature professional practice advisors who can discuss what the thriving firms are doing to position themselves for the recovery and what they’re doing to create competitive advantages for sustaining their growth in the near future. You will leave the program with specific actions your firm can take right now.

Despite how simple celebrities like Henry Winkler and Tom Selleck make reverse mortgages out to be on their television commercials targeting seniors, loss mitigation for reverse mortgages confounds homeowners, advocates, and judges alike. In his June 2020 Illinois Bar Journal article, “Reverse Mortgages Gone Bad,” Matthew Hulstein explains what families can do to bring a reverse mortgage out of default and keep their home.

Several days ago, I published a brief statement on Illinois Lawyer Now that has resulted in substantial response from our members. Several nights ago, we as a nation viewed federal troops in uniform clearing out peaceful demonstrators in Washington D.C. As an ISBA President who has focused on the rule of law and the legal process, I felt a statement was important. The focus of that statement missed the mark in a number of important ways. For that reason, I apologize.