Transportation law significance of negligent hiring claimBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, September 2000The Illinois Appellate Court's recent decision on the issue of negligent hiring in Strickland v. Communications & Cable of Chicago, 304 Ill. App. 3d 679, 710 N.E. 2d 55 (First Dist., 1999) is an important decision not only for purposes of employment law, but also for purposes of transportation law for the reasons detailed below.
No federal jurisdiction over broker claim for unpaid freight chargesBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 2000In S&B Transportation Inc. v. Allan Distributors, 1999 Fed. Car. Cases ¶84, 104 (E.D.N.Y. 3/30/1999), the U.S. district court dismissed a broker's freight charge collection suit relating to interstate transportation for lack of federal jurisdiction.
OSHA remedy preempts truck driver’s wrongful discharge claimBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 2000The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has affirmed the dismissal of a truck driver's common law wrongful discharge claim in Barlow v. The Martin-Brower Company, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 443 (6th Cir., 1/5/2000).
U.S. District Court addresses broker cargo liability issuesBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 2000The pending U.S. District Court action in Custom Cartage, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. is providing well reasoned and important transportation law opinions addressing a number of issues, including broker responsibility for cargo loss and damage claims.
ADA claimant must request reasonable accommodationBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, February 2000The U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago affirmed a trial court's summary judgment in favor of an employer and against a former employee in an Americans With Disabilities Act case brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1201 in Robin v. Espo Engineering Corp., No. 98-3909 (served 1/13/00).
Illinois Court OOIDA’s challenge to Illinois Motor Fuel Use Tax ActBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, February 2000On December 2, 1999, the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois rejected a constitutional attack on the Illinois Motor Fuel Use Tax Act, 35 ILCS 505/13a, in Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association ("OOIDA") v. Bower, 99 CH-02632, on a number of grounds.
Massachusetts district court denies summary judgment in concealed damage case where claim filed thirteen months after deliveryBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, December 1999In Norpin Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. CTS Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc., 1999 WL 754038 (D. Mass.) ____F. Supp. 3d ____ (decided 9/21/99), the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied a motor carrier's motion for summary judgment in a cargo loss and damage claim brought under the Carmack Amendment at 49 U.S.C. §14706 even though the plaintiff shipper's initial claim for cargo damage was not filed with the defendant motor carrier until thirteen months after delivery.
U.S. District Court finds Carmack Amendment claim against property broker does not preempt state law claimsBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, December 1999In Custom Cartage, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., 1999 WL 89563 (N.D. Ill. 2/16/99), Custom filed a declaratory judgment suit against Motorola in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois wherein it asserted that because it was a property broker, it owed nothing to Motorola after one million dollars worth of goods were stolen from a truck which Custom had hired to move Motorola's freight from Harvard, IL to Miami, FL.
U.S. District Court grants partial summary judgment against contract carrier in Carmack Amendment litigationBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, December 1999In Custom Cartage, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., 1999 WL 965686 (N.D. Ill., 10/15/99), Motorola brought a Carmack Amendment claim under 49 U.S.C. §14706(a)(1) against J&P Transport and moved for summary judgment against that entity as the originating carrier on a load of telephones that moved from Harvard, IL and to Miami, FL and was short one million dollars worth of cargo on arrival at destination.
Transportation law updatesBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 1999The Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that employers are bound by the terms and provisions of their employment policies and are barred from making unilateral changes to existing employee rights established by those policies.
Transportation law updateBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, January 1999In the update for this issue, we will again address recent rulings and decisions which impact on our transportation clients generally.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Sara Anderson at sanderson@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article,visit the ISBA Newsletters page.