Artificial Intelligence Update
By Judge E. Kenneth Wright, Jr, Judge Michael Chmiel, & Edward Casmere
Bench and Bar,
December 2023
An introduction to the various artificial advancements impacting the legal industry and steps governments and private sector groups have taken to protect against the concerns such technology raises.
The Creation of Artificial Intelligence and What We Actually Know About It
By Judge Michael Chmiel, Judge E. Kenneth Wright, Jr., Edward Casmere, & Kajal Patel
Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy,
December 2023
In the midst of all the benefits that artificial intelligence provides at both the personal and professional level, we must stop to question how much we really know about it and how it functions.
Illinois Supreme Court Sinks the ‘Test the Waters’ Doctrine
By Edward Casmere
Bench and Bar,
July 2021
The Illinois Supreme Court recently decided whether the “test the waters” doctrine is a valid basis to deny a party’s motion for substitution of judge under section 2-1001 (a)(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Shakespeare’s cold wisdom—Too early seen unknown, and known too late?
By Edward Casmere
Bench and Bar,
September 2017
The point of this article is not to advocate for a campaign of carpet-bombing legal briefs and arguments with quotes from Shakespeare, but rather to suggest that this giant of the literary world has gifted lawyers with timeless insights that may help us better “suit the action to the word, the word to the action” as we practice our craft.
People v. Jones: Prejudicial remarks in a criminal trial
By Edward Casmere & Eliberty Lopez
Bench and Bar,
December 2016
In People v. Jones, the First District reversed the convictions and ordered a new trial in front of a new judge based on prejudicial comments made by the State and the trial court.
The Second District avoids causing new ripples in the common law “test the waters” doctrine
By Edward Casmere & Kaitlin Klamann
Bench and Bar,
September 2016
While the Illinois appellate courts continue to disagree as to whether the “test the waters” doctrine may serve as a basis for denying a motion for substitution of judge, both the Supreme Court and the Second District have signaled that, when considering a Section 2-1001 motion, trial court judges should consider whether the circumstances indicate that a party is seeking to gain a tactical advantage through gamesmanship and judge-shopping.
Why do pro bono work?
By James A. Clark & Edward Casmere
Bench and Bar,
September 2015
A look at some of the reasons to provide pro bono work.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.
Select a Different Author