Intellectual ImprobabilitiesBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, July 2016New and notable intellectual property updates.
Taking a defaultBy Daniel KeganInternational and Immigration Law, February 2016Defaulting has pejorative connotations, but sometimes accepting a default judgment may be a wise decision. Courts sometimes permit alternatives to traditional service, FRCP 4. The Hague Service Convention, the Inter-American Convention on Letters Rotatory, and the ubiquitous, pervasive Internet make service of process easier. The Internet has also spawned complaints with hundreds of defendants, often for alleged copyright or trademark violations. For the innocent, downstream, small business defendant, defaulting may be more rational than defending, even when the complaint contains deceptive and false allegations. Decision considerations and likely settlement elements are presented.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, November 2015News and updates of interest to intellectual property law practitioners.
Taking a defaultBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, November 2015Defaulting has pejorative connotations, but sometimes accepting a default judgment may be a wise decision. Courts sometimes permit alternatives to traditional service, FRCP 4. The Hague Service Convention, the Inter-American Convention on Letters Rotatory, and the ubiquitous, pervasive Internet make service of process easier. The Internet has also spawned complaints with hundreds of defendants, often for alleged copyright or trademark violations. For the innocent, downstream, small business defendant, defaulting may be more rational than defending, even when the complaint contains deceptive and false allegations. Decision considerations and likely settlement elements are presented.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, August 2015News and updates of interest to intellectual property law practitioners.
Life extension for lesser-known worksBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, July 2015Five steps to ensure an author's work remains available to the public.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, May 2015Recent news and developments of interest to intellectual property law practitioners.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, January 2015Recent news and developments of interest to intellectual property law practitioners.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, November 2014Recent news and developments of interest to intellectual property law practitioners.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, June 2014Eclectic selective summaries of IP agency changes, IP cases, noteworthy events, and curiosities.
Creatives, entrepreneurs, and startupsBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, May 2014While Creatives, Entrepreneurs, and Startups follow unique paths, there typically are a few major pitfalls to minimize. Here are 19 brief guidelines; some are helpful reminders for established endeavors.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, May 2014Eclectic selective summaries of IP agency changes, IP cases, noteworthy events, and curiosities.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, February 2014Eclectic selective summaries of IP agency changes, IP cases, noteworthy events, and curiosities.
Surveys, science & skepticismBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, February 2014Expert witnesses are used in diverse areas of the law, including intellectual property, and are typically paid for their work, as attorneys commonly are. A skilled expert may find consistent employment helping fact finders understand the evidence and implied facts.
Breaches of privacy and data—New risks, new insuranceBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, October 2013The Internet makes everything much easier, including breaches of privacy and data. Federal and state laws now create employer and data-custodian liability for such breaches. An information audit is suggested. Insurance targeted for these liabilities is now available.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, October 2013Brief summaries or comments on interesting or important IP developments.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, December 2012Eclectic snippets from recent events. PTO warns of insolicitous solicitations; INTA launches teen ed UnrealCampaign.com; ND CA issues ESI Guidelines; FTC recommends truth telling; Academia IP; Ars Gratia Artis; EU; etc.
Intellectual improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, September 2012Short summaries and comments on recent IP cases, Government requests for comment, and other notices.
Intellectual improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, June 2012An eclectic gathering of recent intellectual property news and cases.
PTO notesBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, March 2012News updates regarding the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.
Trademark scam warningBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, March 2012Be aware that private companies not associated with the United States Patent and Trademark Office often use trademark application and registration information from the USPTO’s databases to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.
PTO focuses on feedbackBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, December 2011While the dedicated attention and oft’ times quick responses of Craig Morris and his team at the PTO are making communicating with the Trademark Office much more efficient, it still requires an experienced trademark professional to know the meaning of the diverse electronic choices and to efficiently evaluate how to respond to the non-automated examiners’ office actions.
Intellectual Improbabilities™By Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, June 2011News updates affecting intellectual property attorneys.
Winning chances? Client relations, math, and ethicsBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, June 2011Clients and others often ask attorneys for the chances of winning a dispute. Attorneys often answer, but they should not. Mathematically the wrong question is asked; numerical answers likely violate legal ethics by incompetently providing incorrect and often deceptive information. A better response provides both valid case evaluation and client emotional support without fabricating false certainty.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Sara Anderson at sanderson@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article,visit the ISBA Newsletters page.