Offers of proof: What are they and when do you need them?By Patrick M. KinnallyCivil Practice and Procedure, April 2006The trial court has entered an order which declares the dissolution of marriage complaint that was filed three months previous is: (1) set for trial in 60 days; and that if either party wanted to call more than two witnesses it had to request a pretrial conference seven (7) days before trial.
Ante-nuptial agreements: Broken promisesBy Patrick M. KinnallyGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, December 2005When I was in law school, my family law professor seemed intelligent and energetic about the topic. One area of instruction was “antenuptial agreements.”
Judicial notice revisitedBy Patrick M. KinnallyCivil Practice and Procedure, September 2005Recently, I was involved in a trial where my opponent was attempting to have the court take judicial notice of a municipal ordinance.
Making the rulemakers play by the rules: Admistrative decision making in the immigration arenaBy Patrick M. KinnallyInternational and Immigration Law, May 2005Agencies within the executive branch of government, both on the state and federal level, generally implement statutes entrusted to their administration by the legislative branch either through administrative rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 553) or ad hoc adjudication (5 U.S.C. 554).
A few tools for working with witnessesBy Patrick M. KinnallyYoung Lawyers Division, December 2004I have been taking statements and depositions from people since 1975. First, it was in the context of working for a federal agency where sworn statements were used in enforcement proceedings before a federal administrative law judge.
Terry stops: the riddle of Fourth and Fifth Amendment jurisprudenceBy Patrick M. KinnallyGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, September 2004Benny Bogain has come to see you. Over the years, he has experienced a few problems with local law enforcement officers. A DUI, a battery charge, and most recently a minor ordinance violation for possessing a 12-pack in Lincoln Park.
Making the law work: The Illinois Wage Payment and Collection ActBy Patrick M. KinnallyLabor and Employment Law, August 2004There are at least two statutes in Illinois which assist employees when an employer fails to adhere to an agreement or contract to pay an employee for wages.
Making the law work: The Illinois Wage Payment and Collection ActBy Patrick M. KinnallyGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, June 2004There are at least two statutes in Illinois which assist employees when an employer fails to adhere to an agreement or contract to pay an employee for wages.
Hoffman Plastics and injured aliensBy Patrick M. KinnallyInternational and Immigration Law, April 2004Jose Castro was an undocumented worker from Mexico. He was hired by Hoffman Plastics Compounds, Inc. ("Hoffman") in 1988 to work at its facility which formulated chemical compouds for manufacturers. When Castro was hired, he used a birth certificate which belonged to a friend born in Texas.
Happy trails? Immunity from wilful and wanton conduct for local public entitiesBy Patrick M. KinnallyGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, January 2004The Illinois Supreme Court has provided interpretation of the scope and breadth of the Local Governmental Tort Immunities Act involving the safety of equipment provided by some school personnel to students.
More on vehicular damage as evidence of injury- Motions in limine: Are they relevant and material?By Patrick M. KinnallyCivil Practice and Procedure, January 2004Motions in limine are a wonderful wrench in a litigator's toolbox. But they should not be permitted to deprive a fact finder from looking at a picture that is fundamental to understanding what the dispute is about. They have become overused.
Witnesses, statements and depositionsBy Patrick M. KinnallyCivil Practice and Procedure, September 2003I have been taking statements and depositions from people since 1975. First, it was in the context of working for a federal agency where sworn statements were used in enforcement proceedings before a federal administrative law judge.
Closing argument: Using enlarged trial transcripts and jury instructionsBy Patrick M. KinnallyBench and Bar, June 2003You just completed a four-day trial. The plaintiff claims it is entitled to money damages because your client, Tiger, L.L.C., delivered certain lockers that did not conform to the bid specifications of the plaintiff, Mason School District.
Closing argument: Using enlarged trial transcripts and jury instructionsBy Patrick M. KinnallyCivil Practice and Procedure, May 2003You just completed a four-day trial. The plaintiff claims it is entitled to money damages because your client, Tiger, L.L.C., delivered certain lockers that did not conform to plaintiff, Mason School District's, bid specifications.
A summary on summary judgmentBy Patrick M. KinnallyCivil Practice and Procedure, January 2003Section 5/2-1005(c) of the Illinois Compiled Statutes states that summary judgment "shall be rendered without delay if the pleadings, depositions and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law."
Backstriking jurors: Diligent advocacy or guile?By Patrick M. KinnallyCivil Practice and Procedure, October 2002Recently I was involved in a trial and counsel, in conjunction with the court, were selecting a jury.
Costs: an imbroglio for trial courts and practitionersBy Patrick M. KinnallyCivil Practice and Procedure, October 2000What constitutes an allowable "cost" is not subject to any bright line test. In large part, this uncertainty stems from Illinois cost statutes that do not say what "costs" are recoverable.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.