When is an expert not really an expert?
By Michael J. Marovich
Civil Practice and Procedure,
October 2007
In the case of Somers v. Quinn, the plaintiff appealed the trial court’s granting of defendant’s motion in limine to bar plaintiff’s expert’s testimony and the court’s refusal to grant plaintiff a continuance to find another expert.
Requests to Admit: Vision Point of Sale v. Haas
By Michael J. Marovich
Civil Practice and Procedure,
December 2006
On November 29, 2006 the Illinois Supreme Court granted a petition for leave to appeal in the case of Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. Haas, 366 Ill.App.3d 692, 852 N.E.2d 331 (1st Dist. 2006).
Bankruptcy may sound death knell for subsequent civil action
By Michael J. Marovich
Civil Practice and Procedure,
September 2006
A potential client comes to your office to discuss a possible new civil case. He tells you that he wishes to file a civil matter seeking money damages against some person or company and asks if you will handle it for him.
Can a plaintiff climb out of the pothole issue?
By Michael J. Marovich
Civil Practice and Procedure,
February 2005
Many personal injury cases involve situations in which a defendant claims that they lost control of their motor vehicle due to the fact that they struck a pothole in the street.
Edited surveillance videotape of plaintiff ruled inadmissible
By Michael J. Marovich
Civil Practice and Procedure,
October 2004
It is often a plaintiff attorney's nightmare to learn that the defendant or his insurance carrier has videotaped the plaintiff and has caught him or her doing activities that they claimed they were not capable of doing.
De novo review of underinsurance arbitration awards
By Michael J. Marovich
Civil Practice and Procedure,
May 2004
Victims of automobile accidents often face defendants who lack the resources or the insurance coverage to pay a fully compensatory award of damages.
Beware of the pitfalls of Supreme Court Rule 216
By Michael J. Marovich
Bench and Bar,
November 2003
All civil trial attorneys should take time to review the recent cases of Moy v. Ng, 341 Ill.App.3d 984, 793 N.E.2d 919 (1st Dist. 2003) and Montalbano Builders, Inc. v. Rauschenberger, 341 Ill.App.3d 1075, 794 N.E.2d 401 (3rd Dist. 2003) as they apply to requests to admit pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 216. The two cases illustrate the perils of failure to strictly comply with Rule 216.
Recovery of evidence deposition and transcription costs: An update
By Michael J. Marovich
Civil Practice and Procedure,
November 2003
In Vicencio v. Lincoln-Way Builders, Inc, 204 Ill.2d 295, 789 N.E.2d 290 (2003), the Illinois Supreme Court resolved a split in the lower courts as to whether a plaintiff may recover as taxable costs the professional appearance fees of a treating physician.
Beware of the pitfalls of Supreme Court Rule 216
By Michael J. Marovich
Civil Practice and Procedure,
September 2003
All civil trial attorneys should take time to review the recent cases of Moy v. Ng, 2003 WL 21498945 (Ill. App. 1 Dist., June 30, 2003) and Montalbano Builders, Inc. v. Rauschenberger, 2003 WL 21742271 (Ill. App. 3 Dist., July 25, 2003) as they apply to requests to admit pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 216.
Medical lienholders beware
By Michael J. Marovich
Civil Practice and Procedure,
May 2003
Any plaintiff's personal injury attorney eventually will have to deal with a health insurance carrier's attempts to collect healthcare payments made on behalf of a personal injury victim from the proceeds of any settlement or judgment
ERISA remedial powers and plan reimbursement claims
By Michael J. Marovich
Civil Practice and Procedure,
December 2002
Any attorney practicing in the field of personal injury law inevitably faces claimed rights to reimbursement from an injured party's health insurance company.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.
Select a Different Author