The Death of the Best Evidence Rule
By Ronald D. Menna, Jr.
Civil Practice and Procedure,
May 2024
In People v. Smith, the Illinois Supreme Court held that the Illinois Rules of Evidence codified and abrogated the common law best evidence rule.
Ethical Practices in the Email Age: Courtesy Copy Emails to Judges
By David W. Inlander & Ronald D. Menna, Jr.
Bench and Bar,
May 2021
As the court system has evolved into the era of permitting emails to transmit courtesy copies of pleadings and motions, a troubling trend has ensued: Courtesy copy emails are being used to raise new arguments or make disparaging comments.
Ethical Practices in the Email Age: Courtesy Copy Emails to Judges
By David W. Inlander & Ronald D. Menna, Jr.
Civil Practice and Procedure,
May 2021
As the court system has evolved into the era of permitting emails to transmit courtesy copies of pleadings and motions, a troubling trend has ensued: Courtesy copy emails are being used to raise new arguments or make disparaging comments.
Appellate court clarifies how to properly complete a summons
By Ronald D. Menna, Jr.
Civil Practice and Procedure,
December 2015
Recently, in Arch Bay Holdings, LLC-Series 2010B v. Perez, the Appellate Court set another trap for the unwary plaintiff, holding that service of summons is ineffective where a defendant’s name is not listed on the face of the summons, even though her name is listed on the attachment directing that she be served.
Pennsylvania judge takes a bold stand against unprofessional conduct
By David W. Inlander & Ronald D. Menna, Jr.
Civil Practice and Procedure,
October 2015
Recently Judge Paul Panepinto, presiding over a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, medical malpractice action, imposed a sanction of almost $1 million upon an attorney due to her expert witness’ violation of an agreed order in limine. Could such a sanction be imposed in Illinois to promote attorney professionalism?
Pennsylvania judge takes a bold stand against unprofessional conduct
By David W. Inlander & Ronald D. Menna, Jr.
Bench and Bar,
September 2015
Recently Judge Paul Panepinto, presiding over a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, medical malpractice action, imposed a sanction of almost $1 million upon an attorney due to her expert witness’ violation of an agreed order in limine. Could such a sanction be imposed in Illinois to promote attorney professionalism?
Perception vs. reality: Money in judicial elections
By David W. Inlander & Ronald D. Menna, Jr.
Bench and Bar,
March 2011
A contrast between the approaches taken by Illinois and New York to reduce the public's perception of the role money plays in influencing judicial elections.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.
Select a Different Author