Bank Not Liable Under the Statute of Frauds
By Michael Weissman
Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy,
March 2022
In Modern Industries, Inc., vs. Oxford Bank Corp., the claimants sued the bank for alleged negligence in unilaterally changing the terms of certain loans in violation of the parties’ agreement, breach of fiduciary duty by failing to properly distribute loans, and engaging in in constructive fraud and misrepresentation by waiting to disclose unilateral changes to the final loan documents until the claimants were left with no choice except to close the loans.
Allonge Enables Bank to Enforce Note
By Michael Weissman
Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy,
January 2022
When all or a portion of a bank’s loan portfolio is transferred, it is not uncommon to use allonges as instruments of transfer.
Bank Not Liable Under Fiduciary Obligations Act
By Michael Weissman
Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy,
November 2021
A summary and analysis of Praither v. Northbrook Bank & Trust Co., in which a noncustomer of a bank sought to hold the bank liable under the Fiduciary Obligations Act.
Bank Suffers Wire Transfer Trauma
By Michael Weissman
Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy,
April 2021
A summary and analysis of In re Citibank August 11, 2020 Wire Transfers.
Mortgage Has Priority Over a Late UCC Fixture Filing
By Michael Weissman
Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy,
January 2021
Although the UCC has made a wide swath of commercial law uniform from state to state, real estate law remains far less uniform—and that lack of uniformity is reflected in cases involving fixtures.
Failure to Review UCC Filings Leads to Loss for Lender
By Michael Weissman
Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy,
December 2020
In Metropolitan Capital Bank and Trust v. Feiner, the lender was suing the defendant for common law fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. At issue was whether the lender was justified in relying solely upon the defendant’s fraudulent statements or had a duty to dig deeper.
Lost Note Ruled Enforceable
By Michael Weissman
Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy,
October 2020
A summary and analysis of Kim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
When an Account Receivable Isn’t an Account Receivable
By Michael Weissman
Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy,
April 2020
The decision of the Supreme Court of Illinois in Accettura v. Vacationland focuses on an issue involving the validity of collateral on which lenders depend heavily—a borrower’s accounts receivable.
Recent cases
By Michael Weissman
Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy,
July 2017
Recent cases of interest to practitioners.
Recent cases
By Michael Weissman
Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy,
February 2016
Recent decisions of interest.
How secure is your security interest?
By Michael Weissman
Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy,
June 2015
Two recent decisions—each dealing with the effectiveness of filings under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code—demonstrate both the certainty and uncertainty that can be generated by efforts to comply with the UCC.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Sara Anderson at sanderson@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article,visit the ISBA Newsletters page.
Select a Different Author