Section Newsletters

Articles on Agricultural Law

Country of origin labeling: Now you see it, now you don’t By Kristine A. Tidgren Agricultural Law, March 2016 Congress ended 2015 by amending the Agricultural Marketing Act to repeal country of origin labeling requirements for beef and pork.
Syngenta: Billions at stake By Kristine A. Tidgren Agricultural Law, March 2016 If you’re a corn farmer in Iowa, you’ve undoubtedly received numerous mailings or phone calls from attorneys seeking to represent you in massive litigation pending against Syngenta.
2015 year in review—2015 tax organizer supplement By Paul A. Meints Agricultural Law, February 2016 Tax information to take note of.
FAA now requiring registration of drones By Jeffrey A. Mollet Agricultural Law, February 2016 As the use of drones for agricultural purposes increases, the need to understand the rules and regulations relating to such use will be a necessity for those attorneys advising farmers and agribusinesses.
Payment eligibility review of estates older than two program years By Jeffrey A. Mollet Agricultural Law, January 2016 The policy and procedure set forth in Notice PL270 from the U.S. Department of Agricultural, Farm Service Agency, establishes an important potential limitation on continued eligibility of estates to receive USDA farm program benefits.
The Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015: Some tax-planning stability for farmers? By Jeffrey A. Mollet Agricultural Law, January 2016 A review of what the new Act addresses.
Court opinions of interest By Jeffrey A. Mollet Agricultural Law, December 2015 Recent decisions of interest to agricultural law practitioners.
IRS announces new estate and gift tax requirements By Charles G. Brown Agricultural Law, December 2015 An explanation of the recent changes you need to be aware of.
USDA encourages producers to consider risk protection coverage before fall crop sales deadlines Agricultural Law, September 2015 The 2014 Farm Bill expanded NAP to include higher levels of protection.
Victory for Adams County landowners By Christopher M. Webb Agricultural Law, September 2015 Several Adams County landowners recently achieved a legal victory by the dismissal of a complaint in a ruling against Ameren Transmission Company. The case involved the Ameren Three Rivers Project, which is a new 345kv electric transmission line set to run across central Illinois from Missouri to Indiana. This project spans a length of over 330 miles and includes nine transmission line segments with substations. It is the largest project in Ameren’s history at an estimated cost of $1.1 billion.
Observations of an old country lawyer…. or, cows and dogs sleeping together…. By Edward T. Graham Agricultural Law, April 2015 A discussion of current "dog-bite" and "cow-in-the-road" statutes and caselaw.
Once a road, always a road—right? By Jeffrey A. Mollet Agricultural Law, April 2015 A look at the recent case of Chamness v. Mays.
Observations of an old country lawyer…. or, cows and dogs sleeping together…. By Edward T. Graham General Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, March 2015 A discussion of current "dog-bite" and "cow-in-the-road" statutes and caselaw.
1 comment (Most recent February 25, 2015)
Observations of an old country lawyer…. or, cows and dogs sleeping together…. By Edward T. Graham Bench and Bar, March 2015 A discussion of current "dog-bite" and "cow-in-the-road" statutes and caselaw.
Remembering the “bundle of sticks” law school reprise By Jeffrey A. Mollet Agricultural Law, March 2015 Given the recent flurry of oil and gas leasing, coal mining, pipeline proposals and installation, and now overhead electric transmission issues, many attorneys have or need to rethink their approach to real estate deals and begin to understand the true nature of the interest being sold or purchased.
Update on the 2014 Farm Bill: Decisions for farm owners and producers By Jonathan Coppess Agricultural Law, March 2015 This article reviews the commodity support and crop insurance programs contained in the 2014 Farm Bill with particular emphasis on the decisions required of or available to farm land owners and producers.
Helping a client deal with a dishonest employee By Jeffrey A. Mollet Agricultural Law, February 2015 Some tips for advising clients who need to investigate an employee's conduct.
The missing link: Farmers’ class action against Syngenta may answer legal questions left after the StarLink and LibertyLink litigation By Lisa R. Schlessinger & A. Bryan Endres Agricultural Law, February 2015 Although the increasingly vocal debate over the labeling of food containing genetically modified  organisms has captured most of the public and agricultural community’s recent attention, two other controversies working their way through the court system may have an equally significant impact on farming and coexistence.
1 comment (Most recent February 11, 2015)
In prescriptive easement claims the element of what constitutes exclusivity of use was recently clarified by the Illinois Supreme Court By Michael A. Mattingly Agricultural Law, December 2014 A discussion of the recent case of Nationwide Financial, LP v. Pobuda.
Privacy and security principles for farm data—November 13, 2014 Agricultural Law, December 2014 The organizations and companies listed in this article believe the following data principles should be adopted by each Agriculture Technology Provider.
1 comment (Most recent May 23, 2015)
Using spaghetti westerns to understand coal mining in today’s agricultural setting By Jeffrey A. Mollet Agricultural Law, December 2014 This newsletter's editor has discovered that the present state of the mining industry can be summed up by simply referring to the titles of Sergio Leone’s spaghetti western “dollars” movies from 50 years ago.
Is there an Oliver Douglas in the house? By Jeffrey A. Mollet Agricultural Law, October 2014 “Right-to-farm” laws have been at least partially successful in defeating claims or chilling litigation by new neighbors against established farming operations, especially those cases relying on nuisance as the cause of action.
Missouri right-to-farm now a Constitutional amendment By Jeffrey A. Mollet Agricultural Law, October 2014 Every state has adopted some type of right-to-farm law in its statutory scheme,1 but only two have raised that protection to the constitutional level.
Piercing the corporate veil—Should farmers care? By Jeffrey A. Mollet Agricultural Law, September 2014 Can the corporate veil be pierced to collect a judgment from a non-shareholder? This question was addressed by the Illinois Appellate Court for the First District in Buckley v. Abuzir.
Relying on a homestead exemption? Make sure your client is on title By Jeffrey A. Mollet Agricultural Law, September 2014 The recent decision of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, v. Arrigo et al demonstrates the pitfalls that not formalizing title may bring.
2014 Farm Act shifts crop commodity programs away from fixed payments and expands program choices By Anne Effland, Joseph Cooper, & Erik O’Donoghue Agricultural Law, August 2014 An overview of the new law from the Economic Research Service of the United States Department of Agriculture.
Grain contracting itself not sufficient to vest jurisdiction in Illinois By Jeffrey A. Mollet Agricultural Law, June 2014 The Seventh Circuit, in Northern Grain Marketing, LLC v. Greving, recently affirmed the District Court’s ruling that the defendant lacked sufficient minimum contacts with Illinois to vest the court with personal jurisdiction.
Monsanto and conventional growers: Legitimacy of inadvertent patent infringement By Ganiyou Gassikia Agricultural Law, June 2014 Could Monsanto sue farmers for patent infringement if drifts of its patented genetically modified seeds contaminate their lands?
The current state of the farmland market: Observations, opinions, and outlook By John D. Moss Agricultural Law, April 2014 The author provides an update on the farmland prices and trends.
Illinois federal court finds that beneficial owner of Illinois land trust does not qualify as an “owner” for farm program payments By Kristine A. Tidgren Agricultural Law, April 2014 The District Court for the Northern District of Illinois has ruled that the definition of “owner” for purposes of Farm Service Agency payments through the Direct and Counter Cyclical Payment Program does not include the beneficial owner of an Illinois Land Trust.
2 comments (Most recent April 10, 2014)

Select a Different Subject