ADA ‘Tester’ Standing Case Evades U.S. Supreme Court Review—For NowBy Todd Rosenbaum & Sebastian NavarroFederal Civil Practice, February 2024As the United States Supreme Court was on the cusp of resolving a circuit split concerning the propriety of “tester” standing under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the self-avowed ADA tester who was responsible for creating the circuit split by filing lawsuits in numerous jurisdictions voluntarily dismissed the case on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine.
Technology and the ADABy Ethel SpyratosLegal Technology, Standing Committee on, February 2023Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 prohibits discrimination based on disability in places of public accommodation, but doesn't directly address whether places of public accommodation include websites.
A ‘Get Out of Masking Free’ Card Based on the ADA?By James M. Paul & Andrew L. MetcalfLabor and Employment Law, August 2020The sudden appearance of fraudulent face mask exemption identification cards gives business owners and managers an opportunity to review the contours of disability access and reasonable accommodation law.
Website accessibility and the ADABy Ethel SpyratosLegal Technology, Standing Committee on, April 2019There has been a recent surge of lawsuits against businesses under the Americans with Disabilities Act based on claims that their websites are places of public accommodation and are not fully accessible to people with various impairments.
Americans with Disabilities Act: Is your Website Accessible?By Michael D. WongDiversity Leadership Council, June 2017Compliance with Version 2.0 AA of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, published by the World Wide Web Consortium, requires addressing issues that impact how a website is perceived, operable, understandable and robust.
Employers’ rights to conduct pre-employment testing under the Americans with Disabilities ActBy Terrance B. McGannLabor and Employment Law, April 2016While pre-employment testing presents challenges to a wide range of state and federal laws, this article addresses the intersection between an employer’s right to test employment candidates and the guidelines under the Americans with Disabilities Act
Employee lacks ADA claim because of absenteeismBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, May 2013Because there was no evidence permitting a conclusion that the plaintiff was a qualified individual for ADA purposes, the district court correctly entered summary judgment for the defendant on her ADA claim.
Psychological counseling may be a medical examination under the ADABy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, October 2012In Emily Kroll v White Lake Ambulance Authority, the court of appeals vacated the judgment of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant and remanded for further proceedings.
Plaintiff’s challenge to employer’s light duty policy failsBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, June 2012Serednyj v. Beverly Healthcare, LLC, 656 F.3d 540 (7th Cir. 2011), involved claims of gender discrimination under Title VII, The Pregnancy Discrimination Act, (“PDA”), disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and retaliation.
Preparing a will for a client with communication challengesBy Gerry W. BeyerTrusts and Estates, April 2012This article reviews a variety of communication challenges and recommends techniques to reduce the likelihood of these challenges playing a part in setting aside the testator’s will.
Final regulations for the Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act are now availableBy Eileen M. GearyGovernment Lawyers, January 2012The new regulations follow the ADAAA’s directive that mitigating measures not be considered in determining whether an impairment substantially limits a major life activity. Mitigating measures can eliminate or reduce the symptoms or impact of an impairment, and can include medication, prosthetics, and assistive technology.
Motor carrier defeats HIV-positive driver’s ADA and related claimsBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, June 2011The case of EEOC v. C.R. England, Inc. will be helpful to motor carriers and others as it answers some fundamental questions that arise from the ADA statute which have not been previously addressed in detail by the courts.
Return-to-work evaluation is medical exam under ADABy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, April 2010Employers intending to use a return-to-work examination must determine whether the EEOC's seven factors suggest that the examination is in fact a medical examination. If so, the examination must be justified as job related, and backed by business necessity.
Brief review of new provisions in the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 EEOC invites public comment and input on new regulations for the statute through November 23, 2009By Eileen M. GearyGovernment Lawyers, December 2009Last fall, Congress enacted the Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 , which became effective on January 1, 2009. See Pub. L. No. 110-325, 122 Stat. 3554. In the Act’s Findings and Purposes, Congress stated its intention in enacting the ADA of 1990 that the statute “’provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities’ and provide broad coverage.”
Checks and balances at work: The ADA Amendments Act of 2008By William D. GorenDiversity Leadership Council, June 2009The Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008 overrule several United States Supreme Court decisions that had narrowed considerably the scope of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
The ADA on the edge of 17: That was the law that wasBy Patrick J. KronenwetterDiversity Leadership Council, June 2008In addressing the concept of diversity within the legal profession, the constituencies that most often come to mind are women, racial and ethnic minorities and persons with alternate sexual orientations or gender issues. But there is another, sometimes over-looked, group of lawyers who should be included in any discussion on diversity—namely, lawyers with disabilities.
Retaliation: How to prove it, How to avoid it. Attorney’s Perspective – PlaintiffBy Lori D. EckerLabor and Employment Law, June 2007In cases where the plaintiff claims that she was retaliated against for exercising her rights under the ADEA, the usual common law tort damages, such as emotional distress, may be recovered. The same is true for retaliation cases under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The expectation is that the same would hold true for retaliation claims under the FMLA, although there do not appear to be any Seventh Circuit decisions on point.