The Corporate Transparency Act: A New Era of Business AccountabilityBy Nikhil A. MehtaBusiness Advice and Financial Planning, June 2024The Corporate Transparency Act, which aims to enhance transparency among business entities by combating illicit financial activities and bolstering efforts by the federal government to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes, went into effect on January 1.
Supreme Court Holds SOX Whistleblowers Need Not Show Retaliatory IntentBy Jay SchleppenbachBusiness and Securities Law, May 2024Until the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, it was not entirely clear what a Sarbanes-Oxley Act whistleblower had to show in terms of intent to establish a claim.
The Corporate Transparency Act: A New Era of Business AccountabilityBy Nikhil A. MehtaIntellectual Property, March 2024The Corporate Transparency Act, which aims to enhance transparency among business entities by combating illicit financial activities and bolstering efforts by the federal government to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes, went into effect on January 1.
The Corporate Transparency Act: A New Era of Business AccountabilityBy Nikhil A. MehtaBusiness and Securities Law, January 2024The Corporate Transparency Act, which aims to enhance transparency among business entities by combating illicit financial activities and bolstering efforts by the federal government to prevent money laundering and other financial crimes, went into effect on January 1.
Claws Out: SEC Adopts Rules Requiring Listed Companies to Clawback Erroneous CompensationBy Jay SchleppenbachBusiness and Securities Law, May 2023Clawback provisions, which allow companies to recover incentive pay granted to executives for achieving financial performance targets on the basis of decisions and actions that subsequently turn out to be ethically and legally questionable, have become increasingly common in recent years.
The Dangers of Anti-Reliance, Integration, and General Release Provisions in Sales of StockBy Charles W. MurdockBusiness and Securities Law, May 2023In Walworth Investments-LG, LLC v. Mu Sigma, Inc., the Illinois Supreme Court issued an opinion that emphasizes the need for any attorney representing a shareholder selling stock to the corporation or a controlling shareholder to exercise due diligence in determining the basis for the shareholder’s decision to sell and in drafting or reviewing the sales agreement.
Trade Secret: An Overview for Illinois Business and In-House AttorneysBy Ahad SyedBusiness and Securities Law, May 2023Illinois business attorneys and in-house counsel should review the recently enacted Protecting American Intellectual Property Act, which seeks to protect trade secrets from theft that detrimentally harms U.S. security and economic or financial stability.
Trade Secret: An Overview for Illinois Business and In-House AttorneysBy Ahad SyedBusiness Advice and Financial Planning, May 2023Illinois business attorneys and in-house counsel should review the recently enacted Protecting American Intellectual Property Act, which seeks to protect trade secrets from theft that detrimentally harms U.S. security and economic or financial stability.
Two Cheers for OrdersBy Sherwin D. AbramsBusiness and Securities Law, May 2023Inevitably, the appellate court will issue poor decisions. At least let them be non-precedential orders.
Counseling Businesses Trademarking Digital AssetsBy Ahad SyedCommercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy, November 2022A look at common issues that arise in protecting a business’ digital assets through federal trademark law.
Counseling Businesses Trademarking Digital AssetsBy Ahad SyedBusiness and Securities Law, October 2022A look at common issues that arise in protecting a business’ digital assets through federal trademark law.
Still No AnswerBy Sherwin D. AbramsBusiness and Securities Law, October 2022In Lewis, Yockey & Brown, Inc. v. Fetzer, the appellate court held that piercing a corporate veil cannot be applied to an LLC—a decision contrary to the holding in Benzakry v. Patel.
Delaware Supreme Court Holds Corporate Wrongdoing Need Not Be Actionable to Justify Stockholder Books & Records InspectionBy Samuel NeschisBusiness and Securities Law, March 2021The Delaware Supreme Court recently addressed the issue of whether a stockholder seeking inspection of a corporation’s books and records pursuant to section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law for the purpose of investigating mismanagement or wrongdoing by the corporation or its fiduciaries must demonstrate that the alleged mismanagement or wrongdoing is actionable in order to establish a proper purpose for the inspection.
SEC 2020 Annual Report Highlights Enforcement Priorities & TrendsBy John R. SchleppenbachBusiness and Securities Law, March 2021The United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Enforcement issued its annual report for Fiscal Year 2020 and, due to COVID-19, the report reflected a marked decline in the number of enforcement actions brought by the SEC.
How to Assure a Successful Physician Practice Investment or AcquisitionBy Patricia S. HofstraBusiness and Securities Law, June 2020As physician practices, health care entities, private equity, and venture capital firms consider physician practice investments and acquisitions, the players need to address the unique nature of physicians and physician practices in order to assure a successful deal.
Saccameno v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC: Punitive Damages Awarded When Business Ignores Its Own DatabaseBy Connor Q. Hollander & Prof. Charles W. MurdockBusiness and Securities Law, June 2020In Saccameno v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, the court affirmed a jury verdict of punitive damages for violating the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act based on Illinois’ corporate complicity doctrine.