The Unknown and Unusual: Type II Differing Site ConditionsBy Stanley N. WasserConstruction Law, April 2022It is not uncommon on construction projects to encounter unexpected site conditions that impact a project’s schedule and the cost of construction.
The Trinity of Illinois State ProcurementBy Bruce S. BonczykConstruction Law, January 2022The 90th General Assembly of the state of Illinois passed a sweeping revision of procurement in the state.
Copyright Trolls in the Construction Industry—But Is It Good Law and Bad Facts?By David C. BrezinaIntellectual Property, September 2021In Design Basics LLC v. Signature Construction Inc., Judge Sykes described a problem of copyright trolls. In the copyright context, this was said to be a cottage industry of registering many architectural graphics and then suing for copyright infringement, hoping to collect, at a minimum, statutory damages, and potentially an infringer’s profits. But this label made no difference to the result in the case. Not all copyrighted works have the same enforcement potential. Some works may contain highly original content, while others might only have bare minimum originality— “thin” copyrights.
Preserving Evidence on Home Construction CasesBy Adam B. WhitemanCommercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy, September 2020Litigating a case for construction defects can be devastatingly expensive and time consuming for the homeowner and highly disruptive for the contractor’s business.
Can We Mediate Complex Construction Claims?By Hon. Lisa Curcio, (ret.)Construction Law, January 2020Complex construction claims can be resolved or narrowed through mediation.
Editor’s NoteBy Samuel H. LevineConstruction Law, January 2020An introduction to the issue from the editor, Samuel H. Levine.
Illinois’ New Retainage LawBy James RohlfingConstruction Law, October 2019Effective August 20, 2019, Illinois law provides that a maximum of 10 percent retainage may be withheld from payments under private construction contracts and, after the contract is one-half complete, retainage must be reduced to 5 percent for the remainder of the contract.
Would broader use of P3s benefit subcontractors?By James T. RohlfingConstruction Law, April 2019Public private partnerships—a method of involving private parties in some or all of the financing, design, construction, and operation of traditionally public building or infrastructure projects—are becoming increasingly popular.
Effective use of the subcontractor’s sworn statementBy Randolph E. RuffConstruction Law, January 2019The subcontractor's sworn statement is one of most effective tools which contractors use to ensure that lower-tier subcontractors and suppliers receive adequate payment throughout the job.
Pass through and liquidating agreements for the construction industryBy Margery NewmanConstruction Law, January 2019The practical effect of a pass-through claim is the prevention of inefficiencies that result from the privity doctrine: Without a mechanism by which to avoid this doctrine, the subcontractor would have to sue the prime contractor, who in turn would have to sue the owner.
Court affirms engineer’s limitation of liabilityBy Werner SaboConstruction Law, December 2018A federal court in Georgia recently held in U.S. Nitrogen v. Weatherly, Inc. that a limitation of liability provision in an engineer’s contract with the owner was effective and did not violate public policy.