A decision, finally, after nineteen years: Case reviewBy Michael J. MaslankaHuman and Civil Rights, January 2015Although the order in this case was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23, it has a very interesting history and some good tips for employers. Unfortunately, it is also a sad commentary on the delay of justice in some cases.
Ban the Box Law will soon apply to small Chicago employersBy E. Jason TremblayLabor and Employment Law, December 2014On November 5, 2014, the Chicago City Council approved an ordinance that effectively makes the recently-passed Illinois’ Job Opportunities for Qualified Applicants Act (commonly known as the Ban the Box Law) apply to Chicago employers with fewer than 15 employees.
Employer may be liable for deaths after employee sent threats from company computerBy Hon. Russell W. Hartigan & Jessica L. FangmanCivil Practice and Procedure, October 2014On August 12, 2014 the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District, decided Regions Bank v. Joyce Meyer Ministries, Inc., finding an employer may be liable for the deaths of an employee’s wife and children, when death threats were sent by the employee to himself and his family using the employer’s computer network, and the employer voluntary undertook the responsibility to provide security and surveillance for their safety but failed to do so.
The new Illinois Job Opportunities for Qualified Applicants ActBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, September 2014This new Act prohibits an employer or employment agency from inquiring about, considering, or requiring disclosure of the criminal record or criminal history of an applicant until the applicant has been determined qualified for the position and notified that he or she has been selected for an interview or, if there is not an interview, until after a conditional offer of employment is made.
Are the company’s severance and settlement agreements enforceable?By Alan M. KaplanBusiness Advice and Financial Planning, July 2014The decision in EEOC v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., which was filed in February of this year, may affect what language can be used in enforceable severance agreements.
Compensation for household servicesBy Mark RouleauCivil Practice and Procedure, June 2014Anytime a person is unable to perform their ordinary job duties causing them to suffer a loss of income it is very likely that they also suffer a loss of the household services that they would have ordinarily provided to themselves or their spouses. This element of damages is frequently overlooked even though it is very easily calculated.
Employers beware: The emerging anti-bullying/non-discriminatory hostile work environment claimBy Richard A. RussoLabor and Employment Law, March 2014Although the Act, and similar anti-bullying bills considered by 24 state legislatures, were not enacted into law, there is sure to be other attempts in the near future to introduce anti-bullying legislation similar to the Act and modeled after the Healthy Workplace Bill. As such, this emerging area of law is one that employers need to continue to keep an eye on.
Employers sanctioned for failure to correctly complete I-9 formsBy Michael R. LiedInternational and Immigration Law, March 2014Two recent cases teach that the seemingly mundane task of verifying identity and work authorization on Form I-9 is serious business.
OSHA developmentsBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, January 2014Recent updates items of interest to labor & employment practitioners.
Workplace Violence Protection Act in contextBy David KrchakLabor and Employment Law, January 2014The Workplace Violence Prevention Act expands the circle of potential protection under orders of protection to almost any employed person in society.
Employer responsibilities under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActBy Bernard G. PeterCorporate Law Departments, December 2013Compliance with the Act, or at least making a good-faith effort to comply with the Act, could save employers time and expense should the employer or the employee benefit plans of the employer be audited.
Harassment: Supreme Court defines “supervisor” for revising job descriptionsBy James G. GillinghamBusiness Advice and Financial Planning, December 2013As a result of Vance v. Ball State University, all employers should analyze their job descriptions and determine whom they are identifying as supervisors and redraft the language where appropriate.
Medical marijuana comes to Illinois—What it means for Illinois employersBy E. Jason TremblayLabor and Employment Law, December 2013Now that Illinois allows the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes, employers in this state should take steps now to understand the new law and to prepare for its consequences.
Some safety incentive programs may be unlawfulBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, December 2013Incentive programs that discourage employees from reporting their injuries are problematic because, under Section 11(c) of the OSH Act, an employer may not “in any manner discriminate” against an employee because the employee exercises a protected right, such as the right to report an injury.
Traveling employee theory does not extend to employer tort liabilityBy Jason G. SchutteCivil Practice and Procedure, December 2013The traveling employee concept from workers compensation cases cannot be utilized to hold an employer liable for its employee’s tortious conduct through respondeat superior.