Holm v. Kodat: A Primer on Navigable Waterways, Riparian Rights, and the Role of the JudiciaryBy William J. AnayaEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, October 2022The Illinois Supreme Court recently affirmed the lower court's decision that an owner with riparian rights on a non-navigable waterway does not have the right to use that waterway to enter the property of another riparian owner without first obtaining permission.
U.S. Supreme Court Limits USEPA Authority in West Virginia v. EPABy Melissa S. Brown & Michael P. MurphyEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, October 2022On June 30, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion addressing the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to devise emissions caps for power plants based on a generation shifting approach.
Appellate Court Vacates Large PenaltyBy Raymond ReottEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, June 2022An Illinois appellate court panel reversed the trial court judgment regarding civil enforcement of the environmental laws at a famous dump site in Ford Heights.
Ownership and Use of the Subsurface: A Synthesis and ProposalBy Paul K. StockmanEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, June 2022Despite the current and future importance of underground natural gas storage and underground injection of liquid waste, the governing legal rules are inconsistent and often unclear.
Municipalities Need to Fix Their SewersBy Raymond T. ReottEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, December 2021All across Americas, cities are facing issues caused by wear and tear on their infrastructure. Sewer systems are particularly vulnerable to deterioration over time.
Reaffirmation of Policyholder’s Right to Pick CounselBy Raymond T. ReottEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, December 2021With any environmental litigation, there is often collateral litigation involving insurance carriers for the defendants in an attempt to have them pay for the defense and any damages in the case. The carriers will typically defend under a reservation of rights relevant if the policies are triggered.
Tort Claim for Increased Risk of HarmBy Raymond T. ReottEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, December 2021In the recent case of Berry v. City of Chicago, the Illinois Supreme Court reaffirmed earlier decisions holding that increased risk of harm is not by itself sufficient for a negligence claim.
PFAS Litigation: Emerging Trends for the Latest Emerging ContaminantBy Thomas A. Bloomfield, Samantha R. Caravello, Nicholas M. Clabbers, Sarah C. Judkins, & Sara V. MogharabiEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, November 2021A look at current per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances litigation and how it compares to litigation over other contaminants.
Plastic Pollution LitigationBy Sarah J. Morath, Samantha Hamilton, & Amanda ThompsonEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, November 2021An analysis of recent litigation involving plastic pollution.
Illinois Issues One of the Lowest Health Advisory Guidance Levels in the NationBy Matt Walker & Jessica RosellEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, March 2021On January 28, 2021, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency took a significant step forward to address a class of emerging contaminants in drinking water when it released non-enforceable Health Advisory Levels for four different per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
Killing Factory Farm Funding to Resuscitate the World Food EconomyBy Carlie Leoni & Kenneth AnspachEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, March 2021Economic disruptions from a global pandemic combined with a movement toward conservation, sustainability, and animal welfare could provide the impetus for regulatory reform that alters farming from a self-interested industry to a more responsible and sustainable sector healthfully feeding a growing population.
Nationwide Permit 12: Vacatur, Modification, and ChallengesBy Lisa A. DeckerEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, March 2021A look at the ongoing legislation and rulemaking surrounding oil and gase pipeline permitting under Nationwide 12.
PFAS Gaining Legislative and Regulatory TractionBy Patrick J. PaulEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, October 2020In recent years, environmental and toxic tort practitioners have begun to focus on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
In Defense of an Unpopular Drinking Water RuleBy Eric L. KleinEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, August 2020A look at the Lead and Copper Rule in light of the Environmental Protection Agency's 2019 proposed revisions to it.
No Balance Required: A Review of Injunctive Relief Under the Illinois Environmental Protection ActBy James Morgan & Matthew WalkerEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, August 2020A review of the injunctive mechanisms available to governmental authorities and private parties under the Illinois Environmental Protection Act and the body of law surrounding a sweeping evolution of equitable relief that has developed since the spring of 1970.
Supreme Court Seeks Middle Ground in Landmark Clean Water Act DecisionBy Jorge MihalopoulosEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, August 2020An analysis of County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the most significant Clean Water Act case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in over a decade.
The Dicamba Roller Coaster ContinuesBy Jeffrey A. MolletAgricultural Law, June 2020A recent ninth circuit opinion found that the conditional registration of three dicamba-based herbicides was improperly issued by the Environmental Protection Agency.
The Right to Setoff in Bankruptcy: Debtors vs. Farm Service AgencyBy Jeffrey A. MolletAgricultural Law, June 2020An interesting issue as to the right of setoff, or lack thereof, was recently addressed in a farm bankruptcy dispute between husband and wife debtors and the Farm Service Agency.
Trump Administration’s Navigable Waters Protection Rule Reduces the Reach of the Clean Water ActBy Jorge MihalopoulosEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, June 2020On April 21, 2020, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Environmental Protection Agency achieved a top priority of the Trump Administration’s environmental agenda: Narrowing the scope of the Clean Water Act by officially replacing the Obama Administration’s Clean Water Rule.
U.S. Supreme Court Confirms Landowners’ Right to Seek Remediation Costs at Superfund Sites Under State LawBy Shari Lumb Milewski & Robert PettiEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, June 2020In April, the U.S. Supreme Court decided AtlanticRichfield Co. v. Christian, (2020), a case involving landowners who sought to use state law claims in nuisance, trespass, and strict liability to compel Atlantic Richfield Co. to conduct a more extensive cleanup than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency had required under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act.
National Defense Authorization Act Adds PFAS to Toxics Release InventoryBy Richard Desrosiers & John OsbourneEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, February 2020The National Defense Authorization Act was signed into law and became effective on December 20, 2019, adding several per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances to the Toxics Release Inventory program and reporting system.
Trump Weighs in on WOTUS and Repeals Obama’s Clean Water RuleBy Jorge MihalopoulosEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, February 2020The phrase "waters of the United States" has caused ambiguity in hundreds of cases. Although the Trump administration has taken steps to replace the Clean Water Rule, it will not likely end the debate.