Making evidence meaningfulBy Hon. Barbara CrowderCivil Practice and Procedure, May 2009Some suggestions and observations to make evidence more meaningful.
Costs of taking evidence deposition of out-of-state physician properly awardedBy John E. ThiesCivil Practice and Procedure, April 2009In Peltier v. Collins, a unanimous Second District panel held that the trial court properly awarded the costs of the court reporter and videographer incurred by plaintiffs in obtaining the evidence deposition of an out-of-state physician.
Supreme Court creates special panel on Illinois evidenceBy Joseph TyborBench and Bar, February 2009The Illinois Supreme Court has formed a Special Committee on Illinois Evidence with the aim of codifying existing evidentiary law so that it is available in a single source.
Use of literature at trial: “Authoritative” is not the only magic wordBy Scott D. LaneTort Law, March 2007Presently, literature such as treatises, journals, and articles are inadmissible as substantive evidence in Illinois courts. Basically, literature can be used for two purposes.
Suppression of evidence is not a remedy for violating the VCCRBy Jason GunnellInternational and Immigration Law, November 2006Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon: Suppression of the evidence is not an appropriate remedy when state authorities violate Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
Preserving medical evidence and testimony for trialBy Belle Lind GordonFamily Law, October 2006The rules of evidence in the State of Illinois apply equally to medical malpractice cases, personal injury cases, workman’s compensation cases, and domestic relations cases.
Judicial Observation: Caution on the Relaxed Rules of EvidenceBy Hon. Michael J. ChmielChild Law, September 2006The Juvenile Court Act of 1987, 705 ILCS 405/1-1 et seq. [hereinafter Act], is unique among the acts of the Illinois General Assembly in ways other than just those pertaining to substance – the treatment of juveniles.
Coming to a courtroom near you—Evidence-based practicesBy Thomas RiggsChild Law, November 2005In the fall of 2003, Illinois was chosen as one of the two states nationwide to launch a project entitled “Implementing Effective Correctional Management of Offenders in the Community.”
Judicial notice revisitedBy Patrick M. KinnallyCivil Practice and Procedure, September 2005Recently, I was involved in a trial where my opponent was attempting to have the court take judicial notice of a municipal ordinance.
State of mindBy John M. StalmackCivil Practice and Procedure, September 2005A perplexing evidentiary concept is that of a person's state of mind. Hearsay evidence is testimony given in court, either orally or in writing, of a statement made out of court offered to show the truth of the matter asserted in that statement.
Authenticating e-mail for purposes of laying an evidentiary foundationBy Adrienne W. AlbrechtLegal Technology, Standing Committee on, July 2005Increasingly, modern correspondence is conducted, not with pen and paper, but through e-mail. That raises some difficult evidentiary questions.
Supreme Court Rule 216 offers a potential method to recover the expense of an evidence deposition after the Vicencio decisionBy Michael J. MarovichCivil Practice and Procedure, November 2004In preparing for trial, I have seen plaintiff's attorneys send to defense counsel requests to admit facts that seek admissions regarding the causal connection of medical treatment and the reasonableness of the medical bills in an effort to avoid the expense of taking evidence depositions of doctors or medical records personnel.
Edited surveillance videotape of plaintiff ruled inadmissibleBy Michael J. MarovichCivil Practice and Procedure, October 2004It is often a plaintiff attorney's nightmare to learn that the defendant or his insurance carrier has videotaped the plaintiff and has caught him or her doing activities that they claimed they were not capable of doing.
People v. Lomas, 812 N.E.2d 39 (5th Dist. 2004)By Michael KileyBench and Bar, October 2004In this case, the court found the defendant’s detention impermissibly exceeded the scope of the initial stop and was an illegal detention.
Negligent spoliation of evidenceBy Gina M. ArquillaYoung Lawyers Division, December 2003Under Illinois law, the supreme court has declined to recognize a separate cause of action for spoliation of evidence.
Evidence advocacy—the judge’s perspectiveBench and Bar, January 2003This is the second part of the article by Justice Warren D. Wolfson (First District Appellate Court). The First installment was published in the November 2002 newsletter.
Spoliation of evidence: Recent expansion of an old theoryBy Robin P. Bissell & James M. HolstonCorporate Law Departments, February 1999Although the claim of spoliation has ancient roots, it is currently at the zenith of its popularity as a legal theory and litigation tactic. Cases involving alleged and actual spoliation have become front-page articles in the mainstream business press