Applying for naturalization and removal hearings: Can you get a remedy?By Patrick M. KinnallyInternational and Immigration Law, April 2013The Seventh Circuit in Klene v. Napolitano has leveled the playing field. There is no legal reason to give priority to removal proceedings over naturalization proceedings.
H-1B quota for 2014By Tejas ShahInternational and Immigration Law, February 2013A basic overview of the H-1B quota
The 2014 fiscal year H-1B visa quota filing date is fast approaching. The quota opens on April 1, 2013 and it is anticipated that there will be a higher volume of applications this year than in the past three years.
Recent casesInternational and Immigration Law, February 2013Recent cases of interest to International and Immigration Law practitioners.
Does your client’s business employ immigrants?By Scott D. PollockInternational and Immigration Law, November 2012The author provides the outline from his presentation at this year's CLE program, "What if Your Client is Foreign-Born?"
I-9 Compliance: Information for employersBy Scott D. PollockInternational and Immigration Law, September 2012Common questions and answers for employers dealing with Form I-9.
Recent casesInternational and Immigration Law, September 2012Recent cases of interest to immigrational and immigration law attorneys.
Tax and estate planning issues for non-citizensBy Michael R. Pieczonka & David A. BerekInternational and Immigration Law, September 2012The second installment of material culled from the May 3, 2012 CLE presentation, "What if Your Client is Foreign-Born? Good Lawyering in the Global Legal Environment."
Tax & estate planning issues for non-citizensBy Michael R. Pieczonka & David A. BerekInternational and Immigration Law, August 2012The first installment of material culled from the May 3, 2012 CLE presentation, "What if Your Client is Foreign-Born? Good Lawyering in the Global Legal Environment."
Asylum and withholding of removal: The necessity for appointed counselBy Craig R. MillerInternational and Immigration Law, July 2012When an indigent, deportable alien speaking little or no English is not appointed an attorney, the outcome of a removal proceeding is fundamentally unfair.
“The newlywed game”—Marriage fraud in immigration: Ethical guidanceBy Jesse HodierneInternational and Immigration Law, May 2012A discussion of marriage-based immigration, the federal laws curtailing and prohibiting marriage fraud, and recommended actions for attorneys who know or suspect their clients are committing marriage fraud in an attempt to circumvent the immigration laws of the United States.
H-1B quota for 2013By Tejas ShahInternational and Immigration Law, April 2012While it is anybody’s guess how quickly the quota will fill up this year, it is reasonably certain that it will fill up sooner than in past years.
Lawful permanent resident aliens: Is there a right to return?By Patrick M. KinnallyInternational and Immigration Law, March 2012The decision in Vartelas v. Holder should be of substantial significance to lawful permanent resident aliens who long ago may have committed crimes which made them excludable or deportable from the United States.
Recent casesInternational and Immigration Law, March 2012Recent cases of interest to international & immigration attorneys.
The ARDC can now investigate and prosecute the unauthorized practice of law—Good news for immigrantsBy Scott D. PollockInternational and Immigration Law, January 2012Last month the Illinois Supreme Court amended its rules, thereby enhancing the ARDC's authority and benefiting immigrants to the U.S. and their family members, who have a particularly critical need for competent legal advice and representation.
Immigration detainers violate human rightsBy Kelly BrackleyHuman and Civil Rights, December 2011Why should immigrants be treated any differently from anyone else who is arrested—why are they denied due process?
Can corporations be held liable for international torts under the Alien Tort Statute?By Cindy G. BuysInternational and Immigration Law, October 2011The Seventh Circuit recently answered this question in the affirmative in Flomo v. Firestone Natural Rubber Co. But because the Second Circuit reached the opposite conclusion, it'll be up to the U.S. Supreme Court to ultimately resolve the issue.
The Child Status Protection Act is to protect childrenBy Patrick M. KinnallyInternational and Immigration Law, October 2011In the recently decided case of Arobelidze v. Holder, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opined that non-precedential Board of Immigration decisions, ones that do not equate with the force of law do not deserve Chevron deference, because they do not have the “power to persuade.”
Federal law vs. the University of Illinois Act and other similar state statutes that provide in-state tuition benefits to qualifying immigrantsBy Elizabeth AdamsInternational and Immigration Law, October 2011Both lawful and unlawful immigrants who received a high school education in the United States face out-of-state tuition rates even if they wish to attend a college in the same state they attended high school. To lessen this burden, several states across the country have passed laws which grant in-state tuition to unlawful immigrants based on a variety of factors.
Recent casesInternational and Immigration Law, October 2011Recent cases of interest to international & immigration law practitioners.
Immigrants beware—Trademark counterfeiting Is aggravated felony INA §101By Joseph T. NaborIntellectual Property, September 2011Criminal trademark counterfeiting is counterfeiting, and an aggravated felony under INA § 101(a)(43)(R), 8 USC § 1101(a)(43)(R), and supported Immigration judge's removal order. Ninth Circuit rejects argument "counterfeiting" referred only to currency. Rodriguez-Valencia v. Holder, 99 USPQ2d 1476 (9th Cir. 2011).