People v. GeierBy David B. FranksTraffic Laws and Courts, August 2011Initial probable cause did not dissipate merely because Arresting Officer continued to follow motorist for two to four miles, after observing traffic violation, before stopping motorist.
Summary suspension after a motor vehicle accidentBy Lisa L. DunnTraffic Laws and Courts, August 2011A discussion of the recent appellate case of Odom v. White, in which the injuries suffered in two motor vehicle accidents met the statutory definition of a type A injury, which confers implied consent for a blood-alcohol test.
Revenue sharing analysis for traffic citationsBy Marty ShanahanLocal Government Law, January 2011A look at how revenues are shared among the different departments within a municipality.
People v. MaldonadoBy David B. FranksTraffic Laws and Courts, November 2010The appellate court concluded that the DUI statute was ambiguous because it prescribed mutually exclusive sentencing schemes for a defendant who has been convicted of committing a sixth or subsequent DUI.
Back to the basics: Challenging the accuracy of field sobriety testsBy Rachel J. HessTraffic Laws and Courts, August 2010Generally, in order for a “test” to be considered valid, it must be supported by a reasonable degree of validity in accordance with Frye v. United States.
People v. Nunez, Docket No. 108189, SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS 2010 Ill. LEXIS 280By David B. FranksTraffic Laws and Courts, June 2010The Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court finding, holding that Defendant was properly convicted of both aggravated DUI and DWLR, and that DWLR is not a lesser-included offense of aggravated DUI.
Condition, cause AND foreseeabilityBy Albert E. DurkinTort Law, April 2010When an attorney is faced with questions as to when conduct is a cause and when it is only a condition, close attention must be paid to a plaintiff’s conduct.
Defending tickets given for passing a school busBy Rachel J. HessTraffic Laws and Courts, March 2010In Illinois, the driver of a vehicle shall stop such vehicle before meeting or overtaking, from either direction, any school bus stopped at any location for the purpose of receiving or discharging pupils.
FMCSA bars driver “texting” while drivingBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, March 2010Electronic devices used for texting are prohibited under current FMCSR safety regulations.
How to avoid multiple court appearancesBy Ted P. Hammel & Sarah M. VaheyTraffic Laws and Courts, March 2010The recent Third District Appellate Court Opinion of People v. Ziobro, 2010 WL 184073 (Ill.App. 3 Dist. Jan 13, 2010), reinforces the right of a defendant charged with a DUI, or other traffic offense, who expressly follows the procedures in Supreme Court Rules 504 and 505, to have a trial on the merits on the first appearance date (or now, on the first “clerk” scheduled trial date).
People v. McDonough, 395 Ill.App.3d 194, 334 Ill.Dec.764 (4th Dist. 2009)By David B. FranksTraffic Laws and Courts, March 2010In this DUI case, the trial court granted Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence on the ground that the State Trooper had improperly seized Defendant. Because the State Trooper did not engage in any police misconduct, the 4th District Appellate Court reversed the trial court, ruling that the exclusionary rule did not apply to this case.
Sufficiency of proof for a conviction of DUI and reliability of Field-Sobriety Tests in proving intoxicationBy J. Brick Van Der SnickTraffic Laws and Courts, March 2010In an opinion authored by Justice Steigmann, the court reviewed the evidence introduced at trial to determine whether it proved Defendant guilty of DUI beyond a reasonable doubt and also analyzed the Defendant’s claim that the field-sobriety tests were unreliable.
Admissibility of vehicle impact photographsBy Timothy W. KellyTort Law, February 2010The standard for the admissibility of photographs of a motor vehicle collision depicting minimal damage to the vehicles in a personal injury trial has been debated since the First District Appellate Court’s opinion inDicosola v. Bowman, 342 Ill. App. 3d 530 (1st Dist. 2003).
Probable cause and driving while revoked—An evolving standard and split between appellate districtsBy Larry A. DavisTraffic Laws and Courts, December 2009For many too young to remember, there was a time in the jurisprudence of this state when in order to effectuate a stop for the offense of driving while revoked or suspended absent an independent basis for the stop, e.g., observation of a violation of the vehicle code, the law enforcement officer was required to possess independent knowledge that the individual operating the motor vehicle was, in fact, revoked or suspended.
Recent traffic casesBy Thomas M. Moran & James J. AhernTraffic Laws and Courts, December 2009Decisions related to recent traffic cases.
Recent traffic casesBy Thomas M. Moran & James J. AhernTraffic Laws and Courts, September 2009Recent cases of interest to traffic laws practitioners.