Chief updateBy Kenneth DobbsHuman and Civil Rights, June 2006The Native American Bar Association et al., appealed the circuit court’s order dismissing their Complaint seeking Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against the University of Illinois’ Board of Trustees for their use of Native American imagery in the form of Chief Illiniwek as a sports mascot in violation of Illinois’ Civil Rights Act, 740 ILCS 23/5 (2003).
China placed on the Priority Watch ListBy Jeffrey V. SokInternational and Immigration Law, May 2006On January 13, 2005, Wu Yi, Vice Premier of the State Council (PRC), addressed the attendees of the China-US Intellectual Property Rights Roundtable.
China watchBy John T. BaunInternational and Immigration Law, September 2006Three recent articles in the English language edition of the Xinhua News Agency are notable to changes in the legal structure in China and could be important to lawyers whose clients have, or may have in the future, business dealings in China.
Chris Haaff—6+ years of greatness with the Law Student CommitteeBy Robert FinkYoung Lawyers Division, June 2006After more than six years of hard work and extreme dedication, YLD member Chris Haaff is stepping down as Chair of the YLD Law Student Division Committee.
City of Chicago adjudication withstands challenge againBy Patti Gregory-ChangAdministrative Law, February 2006Once again, the City of Chicago's scheme for adjudication of Municipal violations has been upheld after a challenge in Dombrowski v. City of Chicago.
Clerk hands back complaint—Case barred by statute of limitationsBy Robert HandleyCivil Practice and Procedure, November 2006In Union County, the Circuit Clerk’s Office closes at 4:00 p.m. and not a minute later. Unfortunately, the plaintiff learned that the hard way. Roach v. Coastal Gas Station, 363 Ill. App. 3d 674, 843 N.E.2d 393 (5th Dist. 2005).
Co-Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2006Have you started to accumulate your hours of education for the mandatory Minimum Continuing Legal Education?
Co-editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, March 2006Congratulations go out to our Chair, John Adams, Vice Chair, Deborah Benzing and Secretary, John Sheperd, as well as all of the lecturers who presented the ISBA with two educational seminars in February of this year.
Co-Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, January 2006MCLE (minimum, not mandatory, continuing legal education) is here. The officers of the Workers’ Compensation Section, John Adams, Deborah Benzing, John Shepard, the co-editors and all of the counsel section members are working to deliver quality material to assist you in meeting your bi-yearly requirements.
Coexistence failures and damage control: An initial look at genetically engineered riceBy A. Bryan Endres & Justin G. GardnerAgricultural Law, November 2006Riceland Foods, the nation’s largest rice cooperative, alerted Bayer CropScience (Bayer) in June 2006 of its discovery of genetically engineered rice in the 2005 rice harvest. Shortly thereafter, Bayer confirmed this finding and reported the results to USDA.
Commission lacks jurisdiction to review Section 8(d)(1) awardBy Carol A. CesarettiWorkers’ Compensation Law, March 2006In its recent decision in Cassens Transport Co. v. Industrial Commission, 2006 WL 360186 (Ill., 2006), the Illinois Supreme Court held that the Commission lacked jurisdiction to reopen or modify a 10-year-old wage differential award under the Workers’ Compensation Act.
Common mistakes by trademark owners in Mexico, and how to avoid themBy Jaime CastilloIntellectual Property, March 2006Ed Note. The world is reportedly shrinking, NAFTA may be furthering commerce in this hemisphere, exports are an important segment of the Illinois economy, and the Hispanic consumer market is growing. Jaime Castillo summarizes some common mistakes made by US trademark owners in Mexico, and even answers how to avoid them.
Comparing scotch and bourbon regulationsBy Chris WillisJune 2006As with most any consumer regulation, regulations as to whisky face a dual challenge. It is important that customers not be deceived by the label, and that the common understanding of the terms used on the label corresponds to what is in the package. A further, and sometimes competing, goal, is customer satisfaction: ensuring that, within the regulations, room is made so that products are available which meet customers tastes.
Conference Series: An informed discussion of financial access for immigrants—Part 1By Steven W. KuehlCommercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy, August 2006During the past two years, the Consumer and Community Affairs (CCA) division of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago held a series of conferences focused on increasing access to financial services for immigrants.
Conference Series: An informed discussion of financial access for immigrants—Part 1By Steven W. KuehlInternational and Immigration Law, March 2006During the past two years, the Consumer and Community Affairs (CCA) division of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago held a series of conferences focused on increasing access to financial services for immigrants.
Conference Series: An informed discussion of financial access for immigrants—Part IIBy Steven W. KuehlCommercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy, September 2006The first part of this series appeared in the prior issue of Commercial, Banking & Bankruptcy Law, and this material will be concluded in the next issue of the newsletter.
Conservation easements: Smart growth or sprawl promotion?By Jesse J. Richardson, Jr.Agricultural Law, December 2006This article attempts to briefly summarize some of the land use planning issues arising from perpetual conservation easements.
The contract for hire: The exclusive test for determining jurisdictionBy Cameron B. ClarkWorkers’ Compensation Law, March 2006This article will focus on the Supreme Court’s analysis of the issue presented before it. For a full discussion of the facts surrounding the Mahoney decision, please refer to the March 2005 issue of the ISBA Worker’s Compensation Law Newsletter, Vol. 42, No. 3.
Contribution—An updateBy Samuel A. Kavathas, Jr.Tort Law, June 2006This article is intended as an update based on some recent cases regarding contribution. One area which is always a source of confusion is whether or not a party can include a settling defendant on the verdict form pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-1117.
CorrectionAdministrative Law, December 2006In the November 2006 issue of this Newsletter, the provocative article entitled “Thoughts about Conflicts of Interest” was written by Section Council member Jewel N. Klein.
Correction: Enforceability of Illinois judgmentsBy Bob MarkoffCommercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy, May 2006In our Section Council’s newsletter of September 2004, (Vol. 49, No.1), I wrote an article entitled Revival of Judgment Revived.