Editor’s noteBy Karen SewellMarch 2009An introduction to the issue from editor Karen Sewell.
Editors’ noteBy Patrick J. Hughes & Anthony E. RothertHuman and Civil Rights, February 2009An introduction to the issue from Editors Pat Hughes and Anthony Rothert.
Editor’s noteBy Michael L. EnglishReal Estate Law, February 2009An introduction to the issue from Editor Michael English.
Editor’s noteBy Michelle L. Thoma-CulverCorporate Law Departments, February 2009An introduction to the issue from Editor Michelle L. Thoma-Culver.
Editor’s noteBy Michael L. EnglishReal Estate Law, January 2009An introduction to the issue from Editor Michael English.
Editor’s noteBy Michelle L. Thoma-CulverCorporate Law Departments, January 2009An introduction to the issue from Editor Michelle L. Thoma-Culver.
Editor’s noteBy Karen SewellJanuary 2009An introduction to the issue from editor Karen Sewell.
Editor’s noteBy Stanley R. KaminskiState and Local Taxation, January 2009An introduction to the issue from editor Stanley Kaminski.
Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, December 2009Please note that the opinions contained in these articles and interviews are not necessary the opinions of the Illinois State Bar Association and are solely the opinion of the author.
Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2009An introduction to the issue from Editor Rich Hannigan.
Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, June 2009An introduction to the issue from Editor Rich Hannigan.
Editor’s notesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, March 2009An introduction to the issue from Editor Rich Hannigan.
The Efficient Market Hypothesis and ERISAEmployee Benefits, September 2009EMH holds that the price of a stock incorporates all publicly available information about the company; it follows that plan fiduciaries are entitled to rely on that valuation and are not required to second-guess the market.
Electronic Discovery Project in the Northern District of IllinoisFederal Civil Practice, June 2009Chief Judge James Holderman of the Northern District of Illinois has empaneled a special committee to examine issues relating to electronic discovery in the Northern District. A preliminary report would be presented to the Judicial Conference in May, 2010.
Electronic discovery: Pay now or pay later!By Alan PearlmanLaw Office Management and Economics, Standing Committee on, February 2009The days of paper documents are becoming a faint memory and being replaced with e-mail, instant messaging, video and VoIP. Although these tools make our everyday lives easier, they have the potential to become a serious liability for your company if not managed properly.
Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court-Annexed Small Claims Mediation ProgramBy Deborah F. HaasBench and Bar, April 2009In 2008, the Circuit Court of McLean County developed a Small Claims Mediation Program. The program is designed to assist pro se litigants in an effort to resolve their small claims disputes.
Employee’s affidavit insufficient to defeat employer’s motion for summary judgmentLabor and Employment Law, December 2009Employee-side practitioners should use this as a cautionary note to avoid extraneous allegations of bias in such actions, and employer-side practitioners should be mindful of the ability to use such extraneous allegations to argue against allegations of discriminatory-based bias.
Employment agreementsBy Herbert J. KleinBusiness Advice and Financial Planning, March 2009Key points to consider in advising a client considering an employment agreement.
Encased asbestos: Dangerous or safe?By Becky J. SchanzEnvironmental Law, April 2009A recent Seventh Circuit opinion addressed a seller’s potential liability for asbestos that remains within a building after it is sold.
Enforceability of ERISA waiver provisions in antenuptial agreementsBy Michael DiDomenicoFamily Law, March 2009It is appropriate to recognize an action in breach of contract against spouses for failure to waive their ERISA benefits as promised in a prenuptial agreement.
Enforcing federal court monetary judgmentsBy Travis J. KettermanFederal Civil Practice, December 2009Although obtaining a judgment is a worthwhile endeavor, a plaintiff is only truly successful if the defendant actually pays the judgment. This article reviews the various actions taken by plaintiffs to collect money after obtaining a judgment in federal court.
Ensuring fairness in Illinois Whistleblower Act claimsBy Stuart Chanen & Chris StetlerCivil Practice and Procedure, July 2009In an effort to fight fraud, the Illinois Whistleblower Reward and Protection Act allows private parties to bring lawsuits on behalf of the State. But what should the State do when those private parties abuse that power by bringing claims that are without merit?
Environmental cleanup claims survive bankruptcy: US v. Apex Oil Co., Inc.By Raymond T. Reott & Becky J. SchanzEnvironmental Law, October 2009In general, once a company files for reorganization under the federal bankruptcy laws and is reorganized, old creditors may not pursue debts arising before the reorganization.
Equal protection—Class of oneBy John H. BrechinLocal Government Law, December 2009The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently announced its decision in Hanes v. Zurick on August 18, 2009.
ERISA updateBy Amy L. Blaisdell & Wendy S. MenghiniBusiness Advice and Financial Planning, December 2009During the economic downturn, it has become commonplace for putative class action lawsuits to be filed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) on the heels of federal securities cases against publicly traded companies and the directors and officers at their helm.
Essay: Law in a time of cholera*By Mary L. MilanoGovernment Lawyers, December 2009There was an incredible sense of giddiness in our office a week or two ago. In at least some quarters, one could say it was reminiscent of what most of us recall at the end of the bar exam or getting that first job offer.
Establishing actual damages in legal malpractice casesBy Kenneth J. Ashman & Neal D. KitterlinGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, July 2009What happens when the attorney has been retained to defend a lawsuit and, due to malpractice, misses a defense that results in a judgment being entered against the client? Assuming the client does not have the funds to pay the judgment, has the client suffered actual damages as a result of the attorney’s malpractice? A look at the recent case of Fox v. Seiden.