On the psychology of incompetence in the construction processBy Stanley P. SklarConstruction Law, December 2011The author opines that the art of construction is similar to the art of war, but with one very major exception—that the construction process cannot become so adversarial that it rivals war in its destructiveness.
One bite at the apple: Examining pro se litigants’ right to appointed counsel in civil casesBy Hon. E. Kenneth Wright, Jr.Bench and Bar, October 2011The Sixth Amendment ensures that individuals facing criminal charges have the right to appointed counsel; however, no such right exists in the civil realm. Whether a court appoints counsel to a pro se litigant in a civil case largely depends on court resources as well as the availability of pro bono programs.
Outgoing chair’s column: Jury questions—Should they be allowed?By Michael K. GoldbergGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, July 2011There is legislation currently pending that would allow jurors to present questions during a civil trial. Voice your opinions on the issue in the reader comments at the end of this article.
Owner operator not separately liable for cargo damage under state lawBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, September 2011The court found the owner operator lease between Elmore and L&O did not create any separate Elmore duty in tort to Merchants. The action against Elmore.
Painting a solution to Illinois’ trespassing problemsBy Michael MassieAgricultural Law, October 2011Governor Quinn recently signed legislation amending the Purple Paint Law, allowing landowners to mark trees or posts with purple paint to signify "no trespassing" instead of the traditional posted sign.
Pay it forwardBy Patrice Ball-ReedWomen and the Law, June 2011Two examples of communities that have utilized and benefited from the "pay it forward" concept.
Pending casesBy David R. ShannonEmployee Benefits, June 2011Recent cases of interest to employee benefits practitioners.
People v. Bruni, 2010 Ill. App. LEXIS 1274 (2nd Dist. 2010)By David B. Franks-StrausTraffic Laws and Courts, March 2011The Appellate Court concluded that defendant’s admission that he had consumed a beer, together with the officer’s testimony “was sufficient to justify the relatively minor intrusion of requesting that a properly stopped motorist step out of a vehicle to perform field sobriety tests."
People v. GeierBy David B. FranksTraffic Laws and Courts, August 2011Initial probable cause did not dissipate merely because Arresting Officer continued to follow motorist for two to four miles, after observing traffic violation, before stopping motorist.
People v. Martin: Trace of drugs and death sufficient for aggravated DUI convictionBy J. Brick Van Der SnickTraffic Laws and Courts, May 2011In the case of People v. Martin, the Illinois Supreme Court found that a driver with controlled substances in his body violates Section 11-501(a)(6) of the Illinois Motor Vehicle Code simply by driving.
Perception vs. reality: Money in judicial electionsBy David W. Inlander & Ronald D. Menna, Jr.Bench and Bar, March 2011A contrast between the approaches taken by Illinois and New York to reduce the public's perception of the role money plays in influencing judicial elections.
Perceptions of justice and fairness for pro se litigantsBy Hon. E. Kenneth Wright, Jr.Bench and Bar, May 2011The question of pro se litigants’ access to courts and the amount of permissible judicial interference in their cases demands our full attention.
Personal property replacement taxes and public librariesBy Phillip B. LenziniLocal Government Law, August 2011If a library existed before 1978, it should be receiving personal property tax replacement funds, either directly from the State or through its host municipality or township.
Philanthropic estate planning using community foundationsBy Dennis J. JacknewitzTrusts and Estates, September 2011A look at what constitutes a community foundation, how it differs from a private foundation, and how an attorney can utilize community foundations for particular client charitable needs.
A pilot program that would allow for the mediation of attorney-client disputesBy Madalyn PhillipsAlternative Dispute Resolution, October 2011The ARDC would be responsible for coordinating, paying for, and explaining mediation to the parties involved. They would also be responsible for assisting the mediator with anything they might need throughout the mediation process.
Plaintiff’s case for overtime pay founders on the “administrative exemption”By Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, October 2011In this case, the plaintiff’s primary duty was directly related to the general business operations of both MediaBank and its customers, and the “administrative” exemption applied, defeating her claim for overtime pay.
Plaintiff’s uncorroborated testimony wards off summary judgmentBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, March 2011If based on personal knowledge or experience, uncorroborated testimony can create disputed material facts. Courts at summary judgment stage should not weigh the evidence or determine the credibility of the testimony; those tasks are for the fact finder.
Pleading affirmative defenses post-Iqbal and TwomblyBy Ferne P. WolfFederal Civil Practice, December 2011Just how much additional language will be sufficient to satisfy Twombly and Iqbal’s enhanced pleading requirement remains to be seen.
PortabilityBy Leonard S. DeFrancoFederal Taxation, May 2011Portability is only available for gifts made or decedent’s dying on or after January 1, 2011, and only for previously deceased spouses who die on or after January 1, 2011. The provisions are scheduled to expire after December 31, 2012.
Poruba v. Poruba: Partitioning a life estate from a remainder interestBy Michael R. LucasElder Law, June 2011In Poruba v. Poruba, the Appellate Court affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s action finding that a single life tenant has no authority to force a partition upon a single remainderman.