Pay equality for women attorneys: The ABA Toolkit for Gender Equity in Partner CompensationBy Julie A. NeubauerWomen and the Law, August 2013The time is now to implement policies and practices for attorney compensation that will encourage the women coming into the professions and young women lawyers working in firms today to stay the course and rise to the level of leadership alongside our male counterparts.
The pension conundrum delivers even more constitutionality issues as legislators are denied their payBy Tiffany ElkingGovernment Lawyers, September 2013On July 10, 2013, Governor Quinn used his line-item veto power on an appropriations bill, House Bill 214, to eliminate General Assembly members’ salaries, effectively vetoing legislator’s paychecks, until a pension reform bill is signed into law. In response, Senate President John Cullerton and House Speaker Michael Madigan have filed a joint lawsuit against Governor Quinn, challenging the constitutionality of his line-item veto.
Person as a whole vs. 8(d)(1) wage differential, a Rule 23 decisionBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, January 2013In Illinois Tool Works v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission, filed January 3, 2012, the claimant injured his low back on March 21, 2003 and underwent a lumbar diskectomy at L4-5 on March 22, 2004.
Personal representatives and special administrators in tort claims: There is a differenceBy Patrick M. KinnallyCivil Practice and Procedure, December 2013Should civil procedure rules should bar prima facie claims where a party dies in the tempest of a garden-variety personal injury claim? Or, frankly, what is the difference between a “special administrator” and a “personal representative”?
Pet Lemon LawBy Angela PetersAnimal Law, August 2013This new law provides consumer protections when purchasing cats and dogs from a pet store. It helps to ensure pet owners are provided with healthy pets upon purchase. If a licensed veterinarian determines an animal ‘unfit’ within 21 days of purchase, a buyer would have the option to get a replacement pet, a full refund on the animal, or be reimbursed by the pet store for veterinary fees.
Pipe-fitter fits the role of a traveling employeeBy Catherine Krenz DoanWorkers’ Compensation Law, January 2013A summary of Venture-Newberg Perini Stone and Webster v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission.
Plaintiff’s covenant moots counterclaim of trademark invalidityBy Eric R. WaltmireIntellectual Property, March 2013Already LLC v. Nike Inc., deals with whether a plaintiff trademark holder can easily moot a case when a defendant challenges the validity of the trademark and what impact the mooting will have on the plaintiff’s trademark rights.
Please check your guns at the door: Employer rights under the Illinois Firearm Concealed Carry ActBy Richard A. RussoLabor and Employment Law, August 2013The Act provides those employers not included on the list of prohibited areas with the flexibility to determine whether or not they wish to permit employees and visitors with concealed carry licenses to carry concealed firearms in the workplace.
Post-majority support for education in IllinoisBy Jennifer WoodChild Law, August 2013While support for college expenses is regularly included in a Judgment for Dissolution, Illinois case law is inconsistent regarding the correct measure of a parent’s financial obligations.
Pour me another trustBy Heather McPhersonElder Law, November 2013Decanting is a great tool for practitioners to use in one’s estate, trust, and elder law practice, because it allows trusts that could otherwise not be changed to be rewritten to adjust to changed circumstances, as well as for corrections to trusts that were poorly drafted.
Practice alert: Consideration issues in covenants not to compete under Fifield v. Premier Dealer ServicesBy Mary Anne Spellman GerstnerGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, October 2013In Fifield, decided on June 24, 2013, the First District Appellate Court found that adequate consideration for a non-solicitation and non-competition agreement signed by an at-will employee required continuous employment for at least two years after the agreement was signed.
Practice Tip—Dealing with beneficiary election in your trustsBy Paul A. Meints & Darrell DiesTrusts and Estates, November 2013Some helpful language that an estate planner might utilize in the client’s inter vivos trust instrument to attempt to deal with the doctrine of election.
Practice tip—Estate tax return auditsBy Paul A. MeintsTrusts and Estates, April 2013According to the “2012 Internal Revenue Service Data Book” issued March 25, 2013, the IRS scrutinized estate tax returns more than any category of individual tax returns in tax year 2011 at close to a 30 percent rate of examination.
Practice tip—How to plan for digital assetsBy Frank M. GreenfieldTrusts and Estates, August 2013Financial and personal data stored online has value and should be included as a component of the estate planning process.
Practice Tip—Review your clients’ Medicare supplement policiesBy James T. NyesteTrusts and Estates, November 2013The author advises that practitioners with elderly clients should get a copy of the client's Medicare supplement policy, since it's possible that the client has a legacy Medicare supplement policy that provides extended coverage.
Predicting IRS guidance after U.S. v. WindsorBy James CreechFederal Taxation, August 2013After Windsor, federal agencies must consider state law definitions of marriage when determining if granting benefits is appropriate.
Prior consistent statements in trial practice: Can you use them?By Patrick M. KinnallyCivil Practice and Procedure, November 2013Our judges and juries are smart enough to figure out that the mere repetition of what a witness thinks is true, even on a repetitive basis, does not make it so.
Prior stipulation by employer dooms its jurisdictional argumentBy Cameron B. ClarkWorkers’ Compensation Law, January 2013In Ingrassia Interior Elements v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission, the claimant filed a Petition for Review of the Arbitrator’s decision denying his claim pursuant to the Act.