Dealing with pro se litigants: A judge’s dilemmaBy Raymond J. McKoskiBench and Bar, January 2018Canon 3(A)(4) of the Illinois judicial code permits judges to “make reasonable efforts, consistent with the law and court rules, to facilitate the ability of self-represented litigants to be fairly heard.” Does this provision help Illinois judges decide whether to intervene in a proceeding in which only one party has an attorney?
Dec. 1, 2018 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil ProcedureBy Patricia S. SmartFederal Civil Practice, November 2018An overview of the amendments to rules 5, 23, 62, and 65 fo the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that will take effect on December 1.
Defendants dismissed without prejudice can be named as respondents in discoveryBy Tal C. ChaikenBench and Bar, May 2018The Illinois Appellate Court, Second District, recently joined the First District in holding that a plaintiff may use the respondent in discovery statute to name a person who has already been dismissed as a defendant in the same case.
Denaturalization: A new government forayBy Patrick M. KinnallyInternational and Immigration Law, November 2018An overview of issues that are often overlooked by those who seek citizenship without counsel.
Descriptions in tax deedsBy John C. Robison, Jr.Mineral Law, December 2018It is common practice for taxing authorities to separately assess and tax lessors’ royalties.
Dicamba lawsuitsEnvironmental and Natural Resources Law, December 2018A summary of some of the legal actions related to damage from the dicamba herbicide drift since the introduction of dicamba-resistant crops in 2016.
Dicamba “terms and conditions”By Jeffrey A. MolletAgricultural Law, May 2018As use of dicamba expands, there have been numerous shifts in policy and procedure.
The difference between causal connection and maximum medical improvementBy Stephen G. BaimeWorkers’ Compensation Law, May 2018The appellate court's decision in Tequila Smith vs. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n explains how to apply the rule of law to the facts when considering causal connection and maximum medical improvement.
Direct examination of adverse witnesses: Use of leading questions in state and federal courtsBy Zoe Brumfield-Meyers & Brian LaCienTort Law, March 2018Current Illinois law lags behind the federal approach to calling witnesses adversely and allowing leading questions on direct examination. As the federal law has expanded to include witnesses “identified with an adverse party,” including close friends, and former and current employees, Illinois still restricts this practice to as “the officers, directors, managing agents or foreman of any party.”
Disclaiming implied warrantiesBy Roger A. McEowenAgricultural Law, December 2018Because items such as livestock, feed, seed, or pesticides are goods, sales and other transactions involving them result in the creation of warranties.
Discovery in construction litigation: Tread lightlyBy Stanley N. Wasser & Howard W. FeldmanConstruction Law, May 2018It is important for us to take care in how we respond to discovery requests—including the making of boilerplate discovery objections.
Discrimination claims: Commission review or independent civil action?By Carl R. DraperLabor and Employment Law, February 2018In Metzler v. Katherine Shaw Bethea Hospital, the Second District has provided a recent ruling that very clearly outlines the contours of the independent right to file suit in court instead of the Human Rights Commission.
Diversity Committee updatesBy Michelle J. RozovicsDiversity Leadership Council, June 2018The International Law & Immigration Section Council share their group's accomplishments and successes from the past year.
Diversity Leadership AwardBy William Borah & Mark E. WojcikDiversity Leadership Council, June 2018The Diversity Leadership Award recognizes long-standing, continuing, and exceptional commitment by an individual or an organization to the critical importance of diversity within the Illinois legal community, its judiciary and within the Illinois State Bar Association. Congratulations to the 2017 winner, Chief Judge Michael Evans, and the 2018 winner, Troy Riddle.
“Don’t ever mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance or my kindness for weakness.”By Beth McCormackWomen and the Law, January 2018As lawyers, be confident in your abilities, know yourself, know what you are willing to do, and know what other people are capable of doing as well. Find the area of the legal profession that fits you and your personality best, and never make assumptions or underestimate a person.
Don’t let the “janitor rule” sweep away your non-competeBy Robert H. SmeltzerLabor and Employment Law, May 2018A recent federal decision from the Northern District of Illinois illustrates the perils of drafting and attempting to enforce overbroad restrictive covenants.
The dreaded intervening actBy Michael RomWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2018Gina Catalanellov. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission provides a good primer on how to both defend against claims of intervening acts and what is needed to pursue them as a defense.
E-mail: Why can’t I keep my free account?By Carl R. DraperGeneral Practice, Solo, and Small Firm, February 2018We have ethical obligations now to be competent at use of technology, and free e-mail has far fewer expectations of privacy and protection from the service provider than paid subscriptions.
Editor’s columnBy Edward SchoenbaumBench and Bar, June 2018A note from the newsletter editor, Edward Schoenbaum.