Illinois Supreme Court issues new rule regarding use of restraints in mental health and disability casesBy Meryl Camin SosaMental Health Law, May 2019The Illinois Supreme Court has issued Supreme Court Rule 296, which requires that trial courts not use restraints on individuals involved in Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Code proceedings unless the court conducts a separate hearing on the record as to the necessity for restraints.
Illinois Supreme Court upholds BIPA technical violationsBy Mark Anthony SpognardiCorporate Law Departments, February 2019The Supreme Court of Illinois recently held that private entities can be held liable for monetary damages for technical violations of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act.
In Memory of Dr. Herb SohnHealth Care Law, December 2019Dr. Herb Sohn, a respected friend and colleague and longtime member of the ISBA Health Care Section Council, passed away on June 7, 2019.
In re Linda B.: Analysis and implicationsBy Rebecca BoorsteinMental Health Law, June 2019Until a recent Illinois Supreme Court decision, there was uncertainty about whether the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Code applied to patients receiving mental health treatment in non-traditional facilities.
An inappropriate mediatorBy Hon. Michael S. Jordan, (ret.)Bench and Bar, May 2019Judge Michael Jordan (ret.) reflects on his his experience during a mediation he attended for one of his relatives.
An inappropriate mediatorBy Hon. Michael S. Jordan, (ret.)Tort Law, April 2019Judge Michael Jordan (ret.) reflects on his his experience during a mediation he attended for one of his relatives.
Inevitable Disclosure No Substitute for Post-Employment Non-Competition ProvisionBy Michael F. BraunIntellectual Property, September 2019Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Sinele, et al. reminds employers that the doctrine of inevitable discovery is not a foolproof substitute for enforceable post-employment restrictions on competition.
Inevitable disclosure no substitute for post-employment non-competition provisionBy Michael F. BraunLabor and Employment Law, May 2019Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Sinele, et al. reminds employers that the doctrine of inevitable discovery is not a foolproof substitute for enforceable post-employment restrictions on competition.
Inside the USPTO-TMBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, September 2019A summary of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office visit to Chicago on July 11, 2019.
Insider Trading UpdateBy Prof. Charles W. MurdockBusiness and Securities Law, October 2019Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court grappled with the requirement that there needs to be a personal benefit to the tipper in order to hold the tippee liable in insider trading situations.
Insured’s duty of noticeBy Mark RouleauInsurance Law, May 2019An overview of the basic governing concepts that apply to all relationships between insureds and insurers.