2014 Farm Bill: Election yearBy Kristine A. TidgrenApril 20162015 saw the first signups for Price Loss Coverage and Agriculture Risk Coverage under the Agricultural Act of 2014.
“Actual fraud” and the discharge of certain debts in bankruptcyBy Jeffrey A. MolletSeptember 2016In Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz, the Supreme Court’s decision settles a split among certain Circuits as to whether “actual fraud” under §532(a)(2)(A)3 of the Bankruptcy Code requires the debtor to make a false representation, or whether the exception is applicable in the absence of such a false representation where the debtor benefited from a deliberate fraudulent transfer or a fraudulent conveyance scheme.
The Clean Water Rule: Waters RageBy Kristine A. TidgrenApril 2016Although some opponents of the Rule had hoped that the recent omnibus package, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, would withhold funding from enforcement of the Rule, it did not.
Deficiency denied due to delay in the sale of collateralBy Jeffrey A. MolletMay 2016Once a loan goes bad, the creditor is often left with many avenues and options but little likelihood of a full recovery. But what happens when the creditor’s action, or inaction, becomes an issue?
Des Moines Water Works lawsuit: A Big SplashBy Kristine A. TidgrenMay 2016A complaint filed last year is asking a federal court to do what no other court or state or federal agency has done: declare farm drainage tile to be a “point source” subject to Clean Water Act regulation.
FAA now requiring registration of dronesBy Jeffrey A. MolletFebruary 2016As the use of drones for agricultural purposes increases, the need to understand the rules and regulations relating to such use will be a necessity for those attorneys advising farmers and agribusinesses.
Future of agriculture? The USDA weighs inBy Jeffrey A. MolletAugust 2016Knowing where “things may be headed” can at least form the basis for proper planning or a comparison for clients who are unsure if they are on pace with the industry.
The GST trust tax trapBy Joseph R. Marconi & Brian C. LangsOctober 2016This article will attempt to assist lawyers in identifying scenarios where the GST tax may come into play so as to avoid or properly identify this menacing tax on generational wealth transfers.
Internal Revenue Service announces inflation adjustments for 2017By Jeffrey A. MolletNovember 2016Some of the IRS' annual inflation adjustments are of interest to those attorneys representing farmers or who are doing related estate, business and/or succession planning work.
Make cash rent negotiations less complicatedBy Dan GrantOctober 2016As cash rent negotiations draw near for many this fall, farmers and landowners should view the process much like school. Those who do their homework are much more likely to fare well compared to those who skip the work and have no plan.
Payment eligibility review of estates older than two program yearsBy Jeffrey A. MolletJanuary 2016The policy and procedure set forth in Notice PL270 from the U.S. Department of Agricultural, Farm Service Agency, establishes an important potential limitation on continued eligibility of estates to receive USDA farm program benefits.
Proposed Section 2704 regulations: Insights straight from the sourceBy George L. SchoenbeckNovember 2016On October 29, 2016, Catherine Hughes, Estate and Gift Tax Attorney Advisor in the Office of Tax Policy of the U.S. Department of Treasury, spoke at the Notre Dame Tax and Estate Planning Institute in South Bend, Indiana. Here are the top four takeaways from her discussion.
Syngenta: Billions at stakeBy Kristine A. TidgrenMarch 2016If you’re a corn farmer in Iowa, you’ve undoubtedly received numerous mailings or phone calls from attorneys seeking to represent you in massive litigation pending against Syngenta.
Temporary nuisance production agriculture in the cross-hairs againBy Stephen R. KaufmannAugust 2016On May 24, 2016, following a three-week trial, a jury in Scott County, Illinois returned a verdict in favor of the hog producer defendants and against ten Plaintiffs who had brought a cause of action for private temporary nuisance relating to odor, flies and dust allegedly caused by a swine livestock management facility. This was the first such trial in Illinois.