2004 Annual Report to the 94th Illinois General AssemblyMarch 2005The annual meeting of the Illinois Judicial Conference was held October 21, 2004, in Chicago. The Conference, which is authorized by Article 6, section 17 of the Illinois Constitution, is charged to consider the work of the courts and to suggest improvements in the administration of justice.
Closing a criminal hearingBy Thomas A. BrunoDecember 2005In People v. LaGrone, the Fourth District Appellate Court reviewed the trial’s court’s decision to close the hearings on motions in limine and to suppress evidence in a case wherein Amanda Hamm and her boyfriend, Maurice LaGrone are charged with the drowning murder of Amanda’s children.
Dealing with pro se litigantsBy Hon. Barbara CrowderNovember 2005“Well, Judge, I guess I did not answer the discovery/bring my witnesses/prepare the case for today’s trial.
E-filing in the 18th Circuit, DuPage CountyBy Hon. Robert J. KilanderNovember 2005Those of us trying to balance court services with dwindling revenue sources are constantly looking for new, more efficient ways to do the work of the court.
The effect of Arthur v. Catour: the defense perspectiveBy Robert T. ParkNovember 2005A frequently recurring issue in personal injury cases is what to do about the gap between the amount billed for medical treatment and the amount actually paid.
How many plaintiffs make a party?By Daniel B. ShanesSeptember 2005In most lawsuits, the plaintiff and defendant are each entitled to one motion for substitution of judge as a matter of right. But how does that apply in a multiple-plaintiff civil case?
How void is void?By Daniel B. ShanesDecember 2005The Appellate Court recently held that in multiple-plaintiff cases, each plaintiff enjoys one substitution-of-judge motion as a matter of right, but those plaintiffs that choose not to join in the substitution-of-judge motion later lack standing to object to that motion’s disposition.
Illinois Judicial Circuit Rules DirectoryBy J.A. SebastianSeptember 2005Technology has changed reliance on yellow legal pads as cell phones and personal digital assistant ("PDAs") assume a greater use among lawyers for noting dockets and phone numbers.
Imaginative sanctions put pressure on attorneysBy Judith G. LysaughtMay 2005In three recent cases from three different jurisdictions, attorneys have been either reprimanded or sanctioned largely because of the actions of other attorneys.
Judges need hugs too: Insights into judicial stressBy Hon. Patricia C. CoffeyMay 2005Judges have it easy. We arrive late, take two-hour lunch breaks, leave early and, when it suits our fancy, take time to don our black robes and reign, arbitrarily and capriciously, in courtrooms where our word is law, at least until it is reviewed by a higher court.
Judicial independence as a campaign platformBy Shirley S. AbrahamsonSeptember 2005Good judging is good politics….the public will support judges whom they perceive as independent even if they do not agree with particular decisions.
Latin loversBy Barbara CrowderDecember 2005Are you familiar with these Latin legal terms?
Letter to the editorDecember 2005A letter from a reader regarding the impacts of the Arthur v. Catour decision.
Mediation skills for advocatesBy Hon. Michael JordanNovember 2005The ISBA Bench-Bar, Alternative Dispute Resolution, and Administrative Law Section Councils are co-sponsoring the “Mediation Skills for Advocates” CLE program in Springfield on Friday, November 18, 2005 from 9:00 a.m. to 12:30 PM.
Not a happy Halloween for the City of PeoriaBy Thomas A. BrunoDecember 2005R & A Productions Inc. v. City of Peoria, Illinois, Case No. 03-1057 filed October 31, 2005 On Halloween this year Judge John A. Gorman, United States Magistrate Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting in Peoria, ruled in favor of Mulligan’s, a Peoria bar, on a summary judgment motion regarding whether Mulligan’s could hold “wet T-shirt” competitions despite Ordinance 3-14, which prohibited such entertainment in non-licensed venues.
“Post-conviction” relief for ineffective assistance in sexually dangerous casesBy Thomas A. BrunoMay 2005In People v. Lawton, the Illinois Supreme Court has decided a case that directly affects the rights of persons found to be sexually dangerous under the Sexually Dangerous Persons Act, and which indirectly affects the rights of persons found to be sexually violent under the similar Sexually Violent Persons Commitment Act.
Pro bono: For the public goodBy Hon. E. Kenneth Wright, Jr.September 2005As lawyers, we need to respond to the tremendous need for legal assistance in the Chicago area.
Recent judicial appointments and retirementsDecember 20051. The Illinois Supreme Court, pursuant to its constitutional authority, has appointed the following to be Circuit Judge: