Case Note: People v. MorgerBy Mark Wykoff & Julia WykoffApril 2020In People v. Morger, the Illinois Supreme Court considered whether a “complete ban on accessing ‘social networking websites’ as a condition of probation is unreasonable and unconstitutional under the First Amendment.”
Casenote: People v. Morger, 2019 IL 123643By Steve BakerAugust 2020A summary of People v. Morger, which looks at whether a statute prohibiting sex offenders from accessing social media is constitutional.
The First Amendment and Disorderly ConductBy Robert DetersDecember 2020The Illinois Supreme Court recently looked at whether pure speech alone can be criminal in People v. Swenson.
From the EditorBy Linda WatsonApril 2020A note from the editor, Linda Watson.
Go SixBy Ted HammelApril 2020Time constraints and pressures can be diminished considerably with a six-person jury, and there is no empirical evidence that a smaller jury renders different results.
The Illinois Bar Foundation Needs Your HelpBy Rory T. WeilerDecember 2020The Illinois Bar Foundation, which assists fellow lawyers who have fallen upon hard times, has acted quickly to address the economic crisis that has resulted from COVID-19.
Must-Know Key Components of Expungement & Sealing LawBy Kristine HoniotesApril 2020Due to the ever-changing expansion of the expungement and sealing legislation, attorneys should be prepared to advise their client of the shorter-term consequences that arise from an arrest, their plea, or finding of guilt.
People v. Sophanavog: Waivers at Plea and the Ripple EffectBy Mark Kevin Wykoff, Sr. & Julia Kaye WykoffDecember 2020In August, the Illinois Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. Sophanavong, where the court considered whether a circuit court’s failure to strictly comply with the requirements of section 5-3-1 of the Unified Code of Corrections to forgo a presentence investigation report requires remand for a new sentencing hearing or whether a defendant can waive the issue by pleading guilty as well as forfeit the claim by failing to raise it in a post-plea motion.
‘Public’ Hearings: People v. Radford and COVID ConsiderationsBy Geraldine D’Souza & Linda WatsonDecember 2020In People v. Radford, the Illinois Supreme Court held that the trial court did not violate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights to a public trial when it partially closed the courtroom during the jury selection process.
Restoration of Gun Rights After Domestic Battery ConvictionBy James SternAugust 2020A summary of Johnson v. State Police, in which a Firearm Owner’s Identification card was revoked under the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act (430 ILCS 65/8(n) due to a conviction for a misdemeanor involving domestic violence.