Eight common employee benefit plan failures discovered during mergers and acquisitionsBy William H. MayerDecember 2014In addition to identifying areas of concern, this article will address potential liabilities associated with the failures and provide a summary of corrective measures that may be available to alleviate the potential liabilities.
Employer reporting requirements finalizedBy Joy SellstromJune 2014A discussion of the Department of Treasury's published final rules addressing two reporting requirements under the Affordable Care Act.
Extension and clarification of expatriate health plan exception under ACABy Janel BryndaJune 2014Global employers with mobile employees may be able to take advantage of the “expatriate health plan” exception to exclude certain employees for purposes of determining the “pay or play” penalty under the Affordable Care Act.
Federal case updateBy Michael BartolicFebruary 2014Recent cases of interest to employee benefits practitioners.
Five proven tactics to minimize ERISA litigation riskBy James Baker & Lisa BroganJune 2014Companies can improve their employee benefit plan offerings and, at the same time, minimize ERISA litigation risk by making small changes to their employee benefit plan documents.
Pension reliefBy Douglas A. DarchFebruary 2014Illinois state pension law is a complex web of built-in extra benefits that costs taxpayers billions. In Hooker v. Retirement Board, the Supreme Court limited eligibility for one of those extra benefits.
Pro bono legal opportunitiesBy Bernard G. PeterMay 2014The author outlines various projects that need your help!
SB1 Pension ReformBy Lori Cowdrey Benso & John LowderFebruary 2014A closer look at the changes.
Smith v. Aegon Companies Pension Plan: Enforceability of venue selection clausesBy Nancy G. Ross & Samuel P. MylerDecember 2014While some district courts, such as the Northern District of Illinois in Coleman v. Supervalu, Inc. Short Term Disability Program have agreed with plan participants that venue selection clauses are inconsistent with ERISA, the Sixth Circuit’s recent 2-1 decision in Smith v. Aegon Companies Pension Plan lends strong support for the prevailing view among the district courts that such clauses are enforceable.
A summary of the anti-cutback ruleBy Patrick M. ColganFebruary 2014A brief overview of some of the components that have been included in a court’s analysis of the anti-cutback rule including examples of that analysis.
Time is not relative for ERISA statutes of limitationBy James Baker & Lisa BroganMay 2014On Dec. 16, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that an Employee Retirement Income Security Act plan’s own contractual time period for contesting plan benefit disputes is enforceable.
A warning to public sector employers: ERISA can apply to youBy Benjamin E. GehrtJune 2014Many HR professionals, elected officials, and even some attorneys share a common belief: ERISA does not apply to public sector employers. Unfortunately, they are wrong.