The “Best” lessonBy Paul OsbornAugust 2008The January 2007 issue of the Family Law Section’s newsletter contained an article written by the newsletter’s current co-editor, Matthew Kirsh, analyzing the Second District’s opinion published in November of 2006 in In re the Marriage of Best, 859 N.E.2d 173, 307 Ill.Dec. 173 (2nd Dis., 2006)
Circuit Court of Cook County’s Expedited Child Support ProgramBy Yehuda LebovitsJune 2008The Illinois Supreme Court created the Expedited Child Support Program in 1992 when it approved the Plan submitted by the Chief Judge of the Circuit Court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 100.1.
Disposition of the marital residence in troubled economic timesBy Hon. Nancy J. KatzNovember 2008Falling real estate values and increasing mortgage foreclosures are taking a toll on divorcing middle class families. This is particularly true when the primary asset of a family is the marital residence.
Evaluating the ethics of ADR programsBy Kurt KamrathDecember 2008The practice of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is rife with ethical dilemmas. It does not take much time in the field before a practitioner will find a conflict between two central aspects of ADR.
Is it a claim or a new action? Characterization of post-judgment petitions in family law cases affects appealabilityBy Linda S. KaganFebruary 2008Given the continued dispute about whether post-judgment petitions are new claims or new actions, it might be a prudent idea to obtain a Rule 304(a) finding and file a notice of appeal as to each order one wants to appeal, alert the appellate court by way of motion that other claims or petitions are pending in the trial court and later, move to consolidate appeals filed along the way.
It’s not nice to fool with Orders to Withhold IncomeBy David N. SchafferFebruary 2008By playing really cute with the provisions of a child support withholding notice, an employer was hit with a $1.1M judgment for penalties.
Message from the ChairBy Paulette GrayNovember 2008Introduction: At the risk of being called a “Star Wars Geek” I continue my Yoda-inspired columns.
Message from the ChairBy Paulette GrayOctober 2008Introduction: Those of you who made it to the end of my last column may remember my promise to provide more “Lessons from Yoda” in future columns.
Message from the ChairBy Paulette GrayAugust 2008Introduction: It is with great honor that I assume the role of Chair of the 2008-09 Family Law Section Council.
Message from the ChairBy Gregory A. ScottJune 2008For as long as I can remember, and many times since obtaining my license to practice law, my father would always tell me that practicing law is a profession and not a job.
Message from the ChairBy Gregory A. ScottMay 2008For many years, I have been using a phrase in my practice that is the only explanation for many of the actions of my clients, the opponent and/or opponent’s Counsel.
Message from the ChairBy Gregory A. ScottMarch 2008A message from Section Chair Gregory Scott.
Message from the ChairBy Gregory A. ScottJanuary 2008As 2007 comes to a close and 2008 begins it is a good time for all attorneys, especially family law attorneys, to step back and examine the previous year before and hopefully refresh once again their desire to continue to practice law in the field of Family Law.
Motions to stay pending appeal in custody casesBy Matthew A. KirshNovember 2008As most practitioners know, the conclusion of a contested custody trial is not, by a long shot, the end of the litigation.
Public Act 95-685 and its impact on family lawBy Paulette GrayMay 2008On October 23, 2007, the Governor signed into law the most comprehensive package of legislation affecting child support enforcement since the introduction of mandatory child support withholdings through the State Disbursement Unit.
A review of judicial gloss on the statutory provisions governing contribution to attorney fees under the IMDMABy David H. HopkinsJanuary 2008The enactment known as “The ‘Leveling of the Playing Field’ in Divorce Litigation Amendments” (P.A. 89-712) (“LPF Act”), effective June 1, 1997, was in fact a complete overhaul of the fee provisions of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (“IMDMA”), 750 ILCS 5/101 et seq., one that included major changes to the rules for contribution.
The role of a Guardian Ad Litem in litigation: Not just a witnessBy Thomas A. Else, J.D. & Sean McCumber, J.D.September 2008The role a Guardian Ad Litem in custody litigation is sometimes confused as to whether the Guardian (GAL) may be allowed to both testify as a witness and to advocate on behalf of the children as an attorney participating in the litigation.
Vision Point v. Haas: Breathing room For litigants on Requests to AdmitBy Steven G. PietrickMarch 2008On September 20, 2007, the Illinois Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. Haas, ___ Ill.2d___, 2007 WL 2729322 (No. 103140 September 20, 2007),1 providing what many in the legal community perceive as a merciful relaxation of the overly strict interpretation of Rule 216’s requirements and the near-draconian effects which can result.