Arbitrator had authority to decide Family Medical Leave Act issuesBy Joseph M. GagliardoMay 2004In Butler Manufacturing Co. v. United Steelworkers of America, 336 F.3d 627 (7th Cir. 2003), Butler, the employer, brought an action to vacate an arbitration award entered pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement ("CBA") between Butler and the United Steelworkers of America ("Union").
Be careful what you ask for… Some releases are void as a matter of lawBy Jac A. Cotiguala & Luarine M. GalovichMarch 2004Are you aware that waivers of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, Illinois Minimum Wage Law, and Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act are void as a matter of public policy?
Case synopsisBy Regina W. CalabroNovember 2004In Maynard v. Nygren, the trial court concluded that the evidence and testimony clearly and convincingly demonstrated that Maynard was untruthful regarding his request for and receipt of the letter from his doctor, and that Maynard intentionally and willfully withheld the letter from the Sheriff.
Case synopsisBy Patricia M. FallonMay 2004Melissa Robinson brought this cause of action for hostile work environment, sexual harassment and constructive discharge pursuant to Title VII against Macon County and State Court Judge Warren A. Sappington. T
Chairman’s columnBy Shari R. RhodeMarch 2004The decisions of the courts, especially in the employment area, have been many. So many in fact that a single issue of the newsletter could not be large enough to bring them to you.
Chair’s noteBy Jack A. StrellisNovember 2004The frequency of discovery abuses, intentional or otherwise, under the federal rules of civil procedure appear to be on the rise, causing consternation for practitioners and judges alike.
The challenges of e-discoveryBy Regina W. CalabroNovember 2004The evolving arena of electronic discovery presents significant challenges and a wide-array of potential abuses.
Comments from the chairFebruary 2004It is an exciting time for attorneys in the Federal Courts. We are facing our newest challenge. Electronic filing is here for some of us and close for the rest.
Discovery abuses in the federal systemBy Regina W. CalabroNovember 2004The Federal Civil Practice Section is directed to raise issues of immediacy of federal practice and then provide necessary, timely, and hopefully rewarding assistance to the lawyer that practices in the federal courts within any of the three districts of Illinois.
Due process does not require that punitive damages be capped at a 4-to-1 ratio with compensatory damagesBy Devlin J. SchoopMay 2004In Mathias v. Accor Economy Lodging, Inc., No. 03-1010 (7th Cir. Oct. 21, 2003), the Seventh Circuit held that a jury verdict, in which punitive damages exceeded compensatory damages by more than four times a single-digit ratio, was not unconstitutionally excessive in violation of due process.
The Federal Court will soon go “paperless”By Arthur B. Cornell, Jr.February 2004The United States District and Bankruptcy Courts in Illinois, and throughout the nation, are converting to a new "paperless" case management and electronic case filing system.
Is an adverse action necessary to state a retaliation claim?By Shari R. RhodeMay 2004Burwell v. Pekin High School (Central District, Case No. 00-2 111), now on appeal to the 7th Circuit, is a Title IX sexual harassment and retaliation case brought by a senior at Pekin High School.
Listening to oral arguments-Long distance styleBy Jeffrey S. FowlerMarch 2004Well, perhaps not long distance, perhaps even from next door, or across town, or even in the middle of the night.
A plaintiff need not present direct evidence of discrimination to get a mixed-motive jury instructionBy Richard J. GonzalezMarch 2004Plaintiffs' employment lawyers are hailing the 2003 United States Supreme Court decision Desert Palace v. Costa, 539 U.S. _____, 123 S. Ct. 2148 (2003) and, just as they did over a decade ago when the Court handed down Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 109 S. Ct. 1775 (1989), and when Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1991, hope that it provides a long-awaited breakthrough in employment discrimination law that will fundamentally alter the playing field which they have traditionally viewed as overwhelmingly favoring employers.
Restriction of litigants’ access to protected health information under HIPAABy Jeffrey P. CarrenMay 2004Regulations issued by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA") prohibit covered entities-health plans, health care clearinghouses and health care providers-from using or disclosing protected health information ("PHI") without the consent of the individual who is the subject of the information, unless such use or disclosure is specifically permitted by the regulations.
Senior judgingBy Milton ShadurMarch 2004Senior status" for the federal judge is a label that covers a multitude of sins-at least as long as the sins don't collide with the constitutional guaranty that provides judges with tenure only "during good behavior."
The Southern District goes electronic!By J. Phil GilbertFebruary 2004I hope that the first time you hear about the Southern District of Illinois' electronic filing system is not by receiving a "Notice of Return of Document for Failure to Electronically File Document."
Supreme Court in reviewBy Joseph M. GagliardoMarch 2004The following is a summary of the seven employment law cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court during its 2002-2003 term.
Technology and The Law seminar-March 12, 2004By Patricia M. FallonNovember 2004The Federal Civil Practice committee co-sponsored the "Technology and the Law" Seminar in Chicago on March 12, 2004.
What is necessary to establish that an individual has a disability?By Shari R. RhodeMay 2004In Poor v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. (Central District, Case No, 00-2321), the court issued a decision on a motion for summary judgment in a case under the Americans with Disabilities Act that provides an excellent text for anyone practicing or wishing to practice in the area of disability discrimination.