CASE NOTE: Fonseca v. Clark Construction Group – Summary judgment for general contractorBy John L. Nisivaco & Kendra PiercyJuly 2014The First District Appellate Court recently determined that a general contractor must retain control over incidental aspects of a subcontractor’s work, not just general supervisory control, to be held liable for the subcontractor’s torts.
Editor’s noteBy John L. NisivacoSeptember 2014An introduction to the issue from Editor John Nisivaco.
Editor’s noteBy John L. NisivacoApril 2014An introduction to the issue from editor John Nisivaco.
Editor’s noteBy John L. NisivacoFebruary 2014An introduction to the issue from Editor John Nisivaco.
Editor’s notesBy John L. NisivacoJuly 2014An introduction to the issue from Editor John Nisivaco.
Editor’s notesBy John L. NisivacoMarch 2014An introduction to the issue from Editor John Nisivaco.
An explanation of the summary jury trialBy Bridget DuignanFebruary 2014If a summary jury trial is right for you, your client and her case, then you reap the benefits (and the pitfalls) of a one-day trial.
ISBA unveils exciting new Member Directory!July 2014Make sure the other members of the ISBA Tort Law Section know what sets you apart and can find you easily by activating your member directory profile today.
No strict liability under the Illinois Animal Control ActBy Jason G. SchutteMarch 2014In Hayes v. Adams, the Second District analyzed whether a dog owner who is not in actual possession or control of their dog at the time the dog bites and injures someone can be liable to the injured person under the Illinois Animal Control Act.
Special interrogatoriesBy Thomas F. Tobin, IIISeptember 2014Section 5/2-1108 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure governs the use of Special Interrogatories. It specifically states that when the special finding of fact is inconsistent with the general verdict, the former controls the latter and the court may enter judgment accordingly.
The Supreme Court provides an opportunity for a cautionary reminderBy Patricia A. ZimmerApril 2014In Country Preferred Insurance Company v. Whitehead, the Illinois Supreme Court held that a contractual time limitation for bringing an uninsured benefits demand for arbitration was not contrary to public policy.