Your IT personnel have become child porn copsBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, May 2009Under a recent amendment to the Illinois Abused and Neglected Child Reporting Act, there is a new obligation on certain Illinois workers to report child pornography which they discover on the job.
Employment claims based on association with another personBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, December 2008You can imagine the unseen narrator on Desperate Housewives, Mary Alice Young, saying something like this: Relationships: From birth we begin to form relationships with others. Our deepest relationships are usually with close family members. Those relationships can bring incredible joy, but sometimes also carry legal entanglements.
Illinois acts to protect biometric informationBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, December 2008Illinois recently enacted the Biometric Information Privacy Act, Public Act 95-0994.
Employee has claim for harassing workplace behavior not directed at herBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, September 2008Reeves worked as a Transportation Sales Representative for C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (“CHRW”) in its Birmingham, Alabama branch office. She was the only female TSR in the office.
Employee lawfully discharged after objecting to disclosing protected health informationBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, September 2008Rockwell Lime Company, seeking competitive bids for group health insurance, requested its employees authorize the disclosure of their protected health information to insurance companies for the purpose of pre-enrollment underwriting and risk rating.
Employer’s confidentiality policy violates labor lawBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, September 2008The NLRB alleged that Northeastern Land Services, Ltd. violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act by maintaining, in its employment contracts, an overbroad confidentiality provision, and by terminating employee Dupuy for breaching that policy.
Memorizing secret information may violate Trade Secrets ActBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, September 2008Al Minor & Associates, Inc., (“AMA”) is an actuarial firm that designs and administers retirement plans and that employs pension analysts who work with approximately 500 clients.
Using e-mail to create a contractBy Michael R. LiedBusiness and Securities Law, August 2008There are a lot of ways to create a contract. Not surprisingly, courts are now beginning to find that an exchange of e-mails can be sufficient.
EEOC issues guidance on employment testingBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, June 2008The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently released a fact sheet that provides employers guidance on employment related testing and selection methods.
Employer’s challenge to unemployment benefits may be evidence of unlawful retaliationBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, February 2008In Burlington Northern & Santa Fe R.R. Co. v. White, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S. Ct. 2405 (2006), the Supreme Court held that an employee subjected to employer conduct, whether inside or outside the workplace, that might dissuade an objectively reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination, suffers a sufficiently adverse action to state a retaliation claim under Title VII.
NLRB modifies recognition bar ruleBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, February 2008The time-honored way in which employees select a union representative has been through a secret ballot conducted by the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”).
Private investigator’s actions lead to invasion of privacy claimBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, February 2008Private investigators can be a helpful tool for business. However, it is important to assure that the investigation does not cross over the line to create an invasion of privacy.
Negotiating separation agreementsBy Michael R. LiedBusiness and Securities Law, January 2008Employers frequently seek to avoid or resolve litigation related to terminating an employee by having the other party sign a release or waiver.
Anti-Pretexting StatuteBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, November 2007Hewlett-Packard’s Chairman, Patricia Dunn, was allegedly upset about leaks to the media about the company’s long term strategic plans. Hewlett-Packard retained an outside firm to gain access to its directors’ phone records, believing that one or more directors were the source of the leak.
Private investigator’s actions lead to invasion of privacy claimBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, November 2007Private investigators can be a helpful tool for business. However, it is important to assure that the investigation does not cross over the line to create an invasion of privacy.
Union not entitled to employee e-mail addressesBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, November 2007In Trustees of Columbia University, Case 2-RC-22355 (August 9, 2007), a majority of a panel of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) found the employer did not violate the law when it refused to provide the union with e-mail addresses of eligible voters.
Does a manager have to express happiness that a subordinate is pregnant?By Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, August 2007Probably not. However, failure to do so was one issue considered significant in a pregnancy discrimination case. Asmo v. Keane, Inc., 471 F.3d 588 (6th Cir. 2006).
NLRB changes damages presumptions when employer refuses to hire paid union organizersBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, August 2007In Oil Capital Sheet Metal, Inc., 349 NLRB No. 118 (2007), the Complaint alleged, and the Administrative Law Judge found, that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to hire Couch, a paid union organizer.
Failure to insure contraceptives was not sex discriminationBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, June 2007Union Pacific Railroad provided health care benefits to its employees who were covered by collective bargaining agreements. While the health plans provided benefits for services such as routine physical exams, they excluded coverage for a number of things. They excluded both male and female contraceptive methods, prescription and non- prescription, when used for the sole purpose of contraception. The health plans only covered contraception when medically necessary for a non-contraceptive purpose.
Mass flu outbreak: Employment implicationsBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, June 2007Not “if” but “when.” According to the Director of the Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”), a pandemic, likely an influenza break- out, is inevitable. Some CDC recommendations have employment law implications. For example, if employees become ill, an obvious issue may be the need to satisfy Family and Medical Leave Act obligations. There may also be issues under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. There could be implications under the Fair Labor Standards Act for employees who are required to work from home. For employers with a union, there may be labor law issues.
Employer’s handbook rules discourage protected labor activityBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, March 2007The lesson in Guardsmark, LLC v. N.L.R.B. is that it is important to review handbook language to assure that it does not violate Federal labor law.
NLRB decides successorship issuesBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, September 2006In Planned Building Services, Inc., 347 NLRB No. 64, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) considered what it describes as two significant issues: (1) the appropriate analytical framework to be applied in determining whether an alleged successor employer has unlawfully refused to hire its predecessor’s employees to avoid a bargaining obligation; and (2) the appropriate make-whole remedy when a successor employer discriminatorily denies employment to its predecessor’s employees and violates its duty to bargain by unilaterally setting initial terms and conditions of employment.
No workers’ compensation benefits for injury at company-sponsored picnicBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, September 2006Allstate Insurance planned a company picnic for July 21, 2000. The picnic occurred on Allstate’s grounds, it was attended exclusively by Allstate employees, and Allstate provided all the materials and equipment.
Union violated labor law by photographing employeesBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, September 2006Randell Warehouse of Arizona, Inc., 347 NLRB No. 56 (“Randell II”), presented the issue of whether a union’s unexplained photographing of employees while union representatives distributed campaign literature to them prior to an election constituted objectionable conduct.
Employee dress and grooming policiesBy Michael R. LiedLabor and Employment Law, August 2006Recently, the full Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, often considered a fairly liberal Court, rejected a plaintiff’s claim that the employer’s requirement that she wear makeup constituted sex discrimination.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Sara Anderson at sanderson@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article,visit the ISBA Newsletters page.
