SEC 2020 Annual Report Highlights Enforcement Priorities & TrendsBy John R. SchleppenbachBusiness and Securities Law, March 2021The United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Enforcement issued its annual report for Fiscal Year 2020 and, due to COVID-19, the report reflected a marked decline in the number of enforcement actions brought by the SEC.
Tenth Circuit Affirms SEC Sanctions on Investment Advisor for Conflicts of InterestBy John R. SchleppenbachBusiness and Securities Law, January 2020In Malouf v. Securities & Exchange Commission, the court affirmed the SEC’s finding that an investment advisor’s failure to disclose conflicts of interest or correct his firm’s statements denying the existence of such conflicts had violated the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Advisers Act, and related rules.
Chair’s columnBy John R. SchleppenbachAlternative Dispute Resolution, May 2018A message from the Section on Alternative Dispute Resolution's chair, John Schleppenbach.
Chair’s column: The future of ADRBy John R. SchleppenbachAlternative Dispute Resolution, February 2018A message from ADR Section Chair John Schleppenbach.
Chair’s columnBy John R. SchleppenbachAlternative Dispute Resolution, December 2017A message from ADR Section Chair John Schleppenbach.
Chair’s columnBy John R. SchleppenbachAlternative Dispute Resolution, November 2017A message from ADR Section Chair John Schleppenbach.
A welcome from the incoming ChairBy John R. SchleppenbachAlternative Dispute Resolution, June 2017Learn more about incoming ADR Section Chair John Schleppenbach.
Supreme Court to consider legality of arbitration agreements containing class action waivers under NLRABy John R. SchleppenbachAlternative Dispute Resolution, April 2017The United States Supreme Court appears poised to resolve a circuit split over whether workplace arbitration agreements containing class and collective action waivers are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act and the National Labor Relations Act, having granted certiorari in three consolidated cases in January 2017.
Tenth Circuit declines to compel arbitration due to conflicts in arbitration agreementsBy John R. SchleppenbachAlternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017The Tenth Circuit’s recent decision in Ragab v. Howard declined to enforce several arbitration agreements because the different procedures specified in the different clauses suggested there had been no meeting of the minds as to the desire to arbitrate.
How substantial is substantial? Conflicts of interest and government attorneysBy John R. SchleppenbachGovernment Lawyers, June 2016The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provide that “a lawyer who has formerly served as a public officer or employee of the government . . . shall not . . . represent a client in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a public officer or employee, unless the appropriate government agency gives its informed consent, confirmed in writing, to the representation.”
Third Circuit weighs in on extraterritorial application of U.S. securities lawsBy John R. SchleppenbachBusiness and Securities Law, June 2015Deciding an issue of first impression, the Third Circuit joined the growing consensus that a securities transaction can be considered domestic (and therefore subject to U.S. securities laws) if title is passed or irrevocable liability to carry out the transaction is incurred in the United States.
Third Circuit weighs in on extraterritorial application of U.S. securities lawsBy John R. SchleppenbachBusiness Advice and Financial Planning, May 2015This court has recently weighed in on extraterritoriality in United States v. Georgiou, equating the place where the purchase or sale occurred with the place where liability to carry out the transaction was incurred.
Seventh Circuit dismisses appeal seeking to dictate issues to arbitrator for lack of jurisdictionBy John R. SchleppenbachAlternative Dispute Resolution, February 2015As the Seventh Circuit recently reminded the parties to a pension funding arbitration in Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. US Foods, Inc., review of an arbitrator’s determinations may generally only be had after, and not during, the arbitral hearing.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.