Second Circuit clarifies bar on extraterritorial application of U.S. securities lawsBy John R. SchleppenbachBusiness and Securities Law, October 2014The bar on the extraterritorial application of the U.S. securities laws applies to cases involving foreign purchases of foreign securities even if the securities are cross-listed on a domestic exchange.
Illinois appellate court holds arbitration agreement unconscionableBy John R. SchleppenbachAlternative Dispute Resolution, July 2014It is notable that the Illinois Appellate Court in Potiyevskiy v. TM Transportation, Incorporated recently affirmed a trial court’s denial of a motion to compel arbitration based on the unconscionability of the arbitration clause.
First District finds waiver of right to force individual arbitration of class action claimsBy John R. SchleppenbachAlternative Dispute Resolution, October 2013A corporate litigant in the First District case of Bovay v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. recently argued that it had not waived its right to arbitrate by failing to assert it during approximately a decade of litigation.
A new defense to malpractice claims for securities litigatorsBy John R. SchleppenbachBusiness and Securities Law, June 2013Securities class action litigators may now defend malpractice actions on the grounds that an award of attorneys’ fees in a class action includes a conclusive determination that counsel’s representation was adequate.
In issue of first impression, First District addresses impact of arbitration award exceeding Illinois’ monetary limits on court-ordered arbitrationBy John R. SchleppenbachAlternative Dispute Resolution, November 2012Until recently, no Illinois court had addressed the impact of an arbitration award exceeding the Illinois Supreme Court's monetary limits. In June of this year, however, the First District in Babcock v. Wallace opined that such an award was erroneous, but nonetheless affirmed its enforcement because the party seeking to set it aside had failed to follow the appropriate procedural steps to do so.
Ninth Circuit concludes issue of whether FAA’s Section One exceptions apply is nonarbitrable, But…By John R. SchleppenbachAlternative Dispute Resolution, April 2012Until the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in In re Van Dusen, no federal appeals court had addressed whether the applicability of the exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act’s coverage contained in Section One of that statute constituted a “question of arbitrability” that the parties could agree to arbitrate.
Spot an error in your article? Contact Celeste Niemann at cniemann@isba.org. For information on obtaining a copy of an article, visit the ISBA Newsletters page.