Targeted: The Transportation Industry and Illinois’ Wrongful Death ActBy Mallory SanzeriEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, September 2023On August 11, 2023, Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed into law HB 219 to allow punitive damages to be recoverable in wrongful death and survival actions.
Fifth Circuit finds state law cargo damage claims related to tank washing services preempted by Carmack AmendmentBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, May 2017This decision in Heniff Transportation Services, LLC v. Trimac Transportation Services, Inc. will add further support to the well established authority supporting Carmack Amendment preemption of state law claims against motor carriers relating to cargo loss and damage on interstate shipments.
Illinois appellate court affirms judgment for hostaged load victimBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, April 2017Bullet Express, Inc. v. New Way Logistics, Inc. promises to be a useful precedent on which victims in future hostage load situations will be able to rely upon in pursuit of any wrongdoing entity(ies) if forced to pursue litigation.
Independent truck driver vs. employeeBy Kenneth F. WertsWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2015An examination of Steel & Machinery Transport, Inc. v. Workers’ Compensation Commission.
Chicago district court grants summary judgment to shipper on negligent entrustment claimBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, April 2014On February 26, 2014, U. S. District Court Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer issued an opinion granting summary judgment to shipper Central Steel & Wire Company, Inc. on a negligent entrustment/selection claim in McComb v. Bugarin, et al.
IDOT long-range state transportation planBy Jeffrey A. MolletAgricultural Law, May 2012On April 30, 2012, the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) announced plans to update its Long-Range State Transportation Plan (Plan), all as required by the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration.
9th Circuit rejects L.A. port’s owner operator prohibitionBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, November 2011A summary of the recent case of American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles.
District court refuses to reconsider Carmack preemption of cargo claimBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, November 2011In Personal Communications Devices v. Platinum Cargo Logistics, Inc., the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California denied plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of a partial grant of summary judgment in cargo claim litigation.
Seventh Circuit vacates FMCSA EOBR ruleBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, October 2011With this court ruling, it is anticipated FMCSA may need to restart the entire mandatory EOBR rulemaking process and rewrite the rule or issue some supplemental ruling that addressed the harassment issue and other issues that have been raised in evaluating the new rule.
New Jersey District Court rejects material deviation claimBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, September 2011The court noted that PMT needed to show UPS’ intentional destruction or theft of the cargo for the liability limit to be ignored and no such evidence had been presented.
Owner operator not separately liable for cargo damage under state lawBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, September 2011The court found the owner operator lease between Elmore and L&O did not create any separate Elmore duty in tort to Merchants. The action against Elmore.
Res ipsa and wandering cowsBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, September 2011Under the res ipsa theory, the facts at issue must be so egregious that the only way the crash in issue could have occurred would be if someone had been negligent.
Motor carrier defeats HIV-positive driver’s ADA and related claimsBy William D. BrejchaEnergy, Utilities, Telecommunications, and Transportation, June 2011The case of EEOC v. C.R. England, Inc. will be helpful to motor carriers and others as it answers some fundamental questions that arise from the ADA statute which have not been previously addressed in detail by the courts.