Before the party’s over: Arguments for and against pre-death will contestsBy Juan C. AntunezTrusts and Estates, April 2013If you’re a working lawyer, it’s easy to dismiss talk of pre-death will contests as theoretical mumbo jumbo only academics have the luxury of fooling around with. That would be a mistake.
Beware of opt-out provisions in tort settlement agreementsBy Stephen SoteloCivil Practice and Procedure, October 2013This article demystifies the opt-out provisions of the newly created Section 2-2301 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and warns practitioners what to look for when handling tort settlement agreements in the future.
Bill would allow courts to deny custody or visitation to rapist fathersBy Tracy DouglasWomen and the Law, June 2013Illinois allows mothers who gave birth to their rapist’s child to block custody or visitation when the rapist is criminally convicted. House Bill 3128 would change that.
The billing world is FLAT: Making flat fees workBy William S. WilsonLaw Office Management and Economics, Standing Committee on, April 2013Flat fees are a profitable alternative to hourly billing if researched and analyzed correctly.
Book Review: Defending Jacob by William LandayBy Jessica DurkinYoung Lawyers Division, October 2013The reviewer contends the twist-filled conclusion, professional ethical dilemmas, and the “murder gene” debate could ignite several lively book club discussions.
Breaches of privacy and data—New risks, new insuranceBy Daniel KeganIntellectual Property, October 2013The Internet makes everything much easier, including breaches of privacy and data. Federal and state laws now create employer and data-custodian liability for such breaches. An information audit is suggested. Insurance targeted for these liabilities is now available.
Bringing in new law firm partners: Strategies for minimizing your riskBy John W. OlmsteadLaw Office Management and Economics, Standing Committee on, April 2013Just because the associate has been a good associate does not mean that the associate will be a good partner—the relationship will be different.
Calculation of AWW when considering future earning per a union contractBy Megan Kivisto & Peter CortiWorkers’ Compensation Law, August 2013In addition to setting forth a clear rule regarding calculation of wage differential benefits, the case of United Airlines, Inc. v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission reminds us that speculative evidence has no place in our practice.
Can monetary exactions conditions of a permit constitute a taking?By John H. BrechinLocal Government Law, September 2013The U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision affirmed the validity of Nollan and Dolan and held that the principles of those cases do not change whether a permit is approved or denied.
Can you find it?By Donald E. WeihlLaw Office Management and Economics, Standing Committee on, June 2013This article will show you how to create your own data system using a Microsoft Word program.
Captive insurance companies—A reassuring way to self-insureBy Jesse T. CoyleTrusts and Estates, July 2013The author, who recently helped to pass North Carolina's Captive Insurance Company law, discusses this unique estate planning vehicle.
CASA: Specialized advocates for medically at-risk kidsBy Stefanie L. CooleyChild Law, May 2013Children who are medically fragile or those having special, medical needs are provided an advocate able to comprehend the medical diagnoses and convey to the courts the meaning behind medical terminology.
Case briefsBy Kyler Juckins, Jerremy Wiker, & Brandon SarkauskasAlternative Dispute Resolution, October 2013Recent decisions of interest to ADR practitioners.
Case briefsBy Casey Harter, Madalyn Phillips, & Taryn VaughanAlternative Dispute Resolution, May 2013Recent cases of interest to ADR practitioners.
Case briefsBy Casey Harter, Madalyn Phillips, & Taryn VaughanAlternative Dispute Resolution, February 2013Recent cases of interest to alternative dispute resolution practitioners.
Case law update: Carr v. Koch, 2012 IL 113414By Edward J. CopelandEducation Law, June 2013In this decision, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that the Complaint was properly dismissed by the Appellate Court for the reason that the Plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the law without finding it necessary to address the Plaintiffs’ argument that they had stated a claim for violation of the equal protection clause of the Illinois Constitution.
Case names and holdingsInsurance Law, December 2013A list of the cases in this issue, arranged alphabetically.
Case names and holdingsInsurance Law, October 2013A list of the cases in this issue, arranged alphabetically.
Case names and holdingsInsurance Law, June 2013A list of the cases in this issue, arranged alphabetically.
Case names and holdingsInsurance Law, March 2013A list of the cases in this issue, arranged alphabetically.