Why do powerful serial harassers get away with it for so long?By Richard T. SeymourCorporate Law Departments, December 2017This article discusses the standards developed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which forbids harassment based on sex, race, and other protected characteristics, and also forbids retaliation against those who oppose unlawful actions or participate in the Title VII enforcement process.
Why do powerful serial harassers get away with it for so long?By Richard T. SeymourLabor and Employment Law, December 2017This article discusses the standards developed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which forbids harassment based on sex, race, and other protected characteristics, and also forbids retaliation against those who oppose unlawful actions or participate in the Title VII enforcement process.
Why does maintenance terminate upon remarriage?By Matthew A. KirshFamily Law, November 2017The Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act is 40 years old. The world has changed. Societal norms have changed. Perhaps, in light of all this change, it is time to examine whether a change to the maintenance termination law is also appropriate.
Why use the U.S. Commercial ServiceBy Lewis F. MatuszewichInternational and Immigration Law, November 2017The United States Commercial Service offers a wide range of resources for you and for your clients who are interested in international trade.
Will the Northern District of Illinois’ Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot program end copyright trolling in the District?By Jonathan LA PhillipsIntellectual Property, September 2017The Northern District of Illinois ordered a Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Program (MIDP) beginning 1 June 2017. Before 1 June 2017, the earliest discovery available to copyright-troll defendants were Rule 26(a) disclosures; the MIDP expands parties’ responsibilities at the outset of the case. Before MIDP, plaintiffs were only required to provide information that it might use to support its claims. Now, MIDP parties must provide mandatory disclosures of information “regardless of whether they intend to use the information in presenting their claims or defenses” and “whether favorable or unfavorable.” Some copyright infringement defendants have paid settlements rather than undertaking the cost of proving their innocence. The new MIDP rules level the playing field of questionable complaints, especially against bulk copyright complaints lacking core plaintiff evidence.
The winner of the Gertz AwardHuman and Civil Rights, September 2017This year's winner of the ISBA Human Rights Section Gertz Award is the John Marshall Law School’s International Human Rights Clinic (IHRC).
A winter’s tale—Snow liability and construction lawBy Nathan B. HinchConstruction Law, April 2017The decision in Murphy-Hylton v. Lieberman Management Services, Inc. is important in clarifying what had been a split issue among Illinois appellate courts – to what extent does the Snow and Ice Removal Act (the “Act”) provide immunity when the claim arises from a snow or ice-related issue, but NOT from the alleged negligent removal of naturally accumulating snow or ice.
The woman behind the robe: Judge Mary Catherine MarubioBy Emily A. HansenWomen and the Law, February 2017Judge Marubio provides diversity to Cook County’s judiciary not only because she is female, but also because she is a member of the LGBTQ community.
Working with the difficult clientBy Stephanie E. GreenbergLaw Office Management and Economics, Standing Committee on, February 2017Follow these rules to save yourself a headache later on.
You can help an elder this summer!By Susan L. DeCostanza & Karen MunozElder Law, May 2017You may not have realized that you can visit an elder in your community and log pro bono hours at the same time, but you can.