Contractor barred from re-recording mechanics lienBy Jason CallicoatFebruary 2015In Oxford 127 Huron Hotel Venture, LLC v. CMC Organization, LLC, the First District Appellate Court held that a general contractor who recorded mechanics lien releases had forever given up its claims for any mechanics liens claims on the project.
Council chair reportBy Bruce H. SchoumacherJuly 2015A farewell note from Ex-Officio Bruce Schoumacher.
Court upholds limitation of liability clauseBy Doug GieseFebruary 2015The recent case of Boshyan v. Private I. Home Inspections, Inc., outlines the tension that exists between “public policy” considerations and written contract terms which seek to impose liquidated damages and limit liability for a breach.
Editor’s noteBy Eric L. SingerSeptember 2015An introduction to the issue from Editor Eric Singer.
Editor’s noteBy Samuel H. LevineJuly 2015An introduction to the issue from Editor Samuel Levine.
Editor’s noteBy Eric L. SingerApril 2015An introduction to the issue from newsletter co-editor Eric Singer.
Editor’s noteBy Samuel H. LevineFebruary 2015An introduction to the issue from Editor Samuel Levine.
North Shore Bank and the ever-changing work completion datesBy Paul PetersonFebruary 2015In this case the First District Appellate Court was confronted with two mechanics lien claims where neither claimant could prove they did work on the work completion date sworn to in their respective mechanics lien claims and reaffirmed under oath in various court filings.
Pay If/When Paid clauses in IllinoisBy Jim DashJuly 2015As a matter of pure contract, “Pay When Paid” or “Pay if Paid” clauses generally are enforceable in Illinois so long as the contract makes payment to the upstream party an unambiguous condition precedent to payment downstream. And if (sub)contractor does not have, or believes that it does not have, the leverage to negotiate the terms of its contract, it often will accept the contract, “Pay When/If Paid” clause and all, just in order to get the work.
The Third District ignores the Mechanics Lien Act, ignores precedent and injures the construction industryBy Howard M. TurnerJuly 2015The author writes that the recent case of Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. v. Heritage Bank of Central Illinois is an aberration which can and probably will cause substantial damage to the construction industry unless it is either reversed by the Illinois Supreme Court or its holding repealed by the Legislature.
Who would win—Foreclosure statute vs. Probate ActBy Nathan B. HinchSeptember 2015Perhaps the Probate Act “won” this initial round, but did the foreclosure laws really “lose” in LaPlume? Not necessarily.
The year aheadBy Margery NewmanJuly 2015A message from new Chair Margery Newman.
Young v. CES, Inc.By Paul B. PorvaznikFebruary 2015In October 2014, the Second District expanded on the Illinois Mechanics’ Lien Act’s substantive and timing requirements and also examined Illinois agency law and discussed what services are and aren’t lienable in Young v. CES.