Cases to watchBy Ronald S. LangackerDecember 2018Nielsen v. Preap challenged the government’s interpretation of a 1996 mandatory detention law requiring that non-citizens be detained for the duration of their deportation proceedings—without a hearing—because they have criminal records.
Chair’s columnBy Kathryn E. EisenhartAugust 2018Introductory comments by the Section on Human Rights Law chair, Kathryn E. Eisenhart.
Janus v. AFSCMEBy Ron LangackerAugust 2018The latest U.S. Supreme Court decision to “weaponize” the First Amendment is Janus v. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the Court held that Illinois’ extraction of agency fees from nonconsenting public-sector employees violated the First Amendment.
Juliana v. United States: The constitutional side of the fight against climate changeBy Bhavani RaveendranDecember 2018In Juliana v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court heard argument on whether it should stay a group of children and young adults’ attempt to hold the federal government accountable for not doing enough to stabilize our climate.
Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights CommissionBy Kathryn EisenhartAugust 2018A summary of the U.S. Supreme Court opinion Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the Court ruled that it is lawful under the First Amendment to refuse to create a cake for a same-sex couple to celebrate same-sex marriage based on religious beliefs.
Recent amendments to the Illinois Human Rights ActBy Ronald S. LangackerOctober 2018An overview of amendments made to the Illinois Human Rights Act, which will help to streamline the charge filing process and provide more avenues through which to seek remedies for discrimination.