Editor’s noteBy Gary R. GehlbachOctober 2003This is an all-star issue, with articles by Samuel Levine, Jack Murray and Dick Bales! Regular readers will recognize these experts from prior issues and numerous other real estate publications.
Editor’s notesBy Gary R. GehlbachSeptember 2003If your practice involves any tax-deferred exchanges of real property, the first article in this issue is a must read. Internal Revenue Code § 1031(f), read literally, provides that if a taxpayer exchanges like-kind property with a related party, the tax deferral will be denied if the property acquired from or transferred to the related party is disposed of within two years.
Editor’s notesBy Gary R. GehlbachAugust 2003A topic that many of us would rather avoid is attorney billing practices. G. A. Finch, a former member of the Real Estate Law Section Council, has shared an excellent article that should help all of us be more effective when billing.
Editor’s notesBy Gary R. GehlbachJune 2003The real estate bar has lost a true friend and perhaps its most ardent educator. Harold I. Levine passed away in May following an illness.
Editor’s notesBy Gary R. GehlbachFebruary 2003We are starting this issue with a short quiz. Did you pass the quiz in the previous issue?
Excerpts from Minutes of Real Estate Law Section Council meetingBy Joseph R. Fortunato, Jr.September 2003The June 21, 2003, meeting of the Real Estate Law Section Council of the Illinois State Bar Association was called to order at 9:30 a.m. at The Abbey Resort & Fontana Spa, Fontana, Wisconsin, by Samuel Levine, Chair.
Federal preemption of state prepayment-penalty statutes: Back to the future?By John C. MurrayOctober 2003Federal associations have, for many years, been able to include prepayment penalty clauses in commercial loan documents and enforce such clauses according to their terms, regardless of any state law to the contrary (including equitable principles). C.F.R. §§ 545.2 and 545.34(c), as amended at 49 F.R. 43044 (1984), authorize a federal association to include a prepayment penalty clause in any loan it makes and to enforce such a clause in accordance with its terms regardless of any state law-including equitable principles in a foreclosure action-that purports to prohibit the collection of a prepayment penalty under certain circumstances.
From the construction cornerBy Margery NewmanFebruary 2003The recent case of Luise, Inc. v. Village of Skokie, 335 IllApp3d 672, 781 NE2d 353 (1st Dist. 2003) (Luise) has further defined what constitutes lienable work under section 23 of the Illinois Mechanics Lien Act (the Act).
Insurer uses termites to pursue home sellerBy Gary R. GehlbachOctober 2003Evidence that sellers of a residence concealed active termite infestation was sufficient for the buyers' homeowners' insurance company to collect from the sellers.
Issues relating to toxic moldBy Margery NewmanAugust 2003Frequently, in the construction industry, a "hot issue" overtakes the industry. The latest "hot issue" is mold-related lawsuits relating to residential and office buildings.
Mortgage defense 102: Pleading fraudBy Harold I. LevineJune 2003Part I of this article1 dealt briefly with the concept of preemption. It stated: "The most favored defense of lenders is preemption.
The new and improved Multi-Board Residential Real Estate ContractBy Joseph R. FortunatoFebruary 2003Transactional practitioners in Chicago and the collar counties may be familiar with a four-page real estate contract form entitled "Residential Real Estate Contract" known colloquially as the "Common Contract."
New laws from the 93rd General Assembly, 2003 Spring SessionBy James K. Weston, Sr.September 2003H 1584: Condominium Act amended to permit absentee voting as an alternative to proxies. Numerous rules pertaining to the implementation of the changes are promulgated. [P. A. 93-0243; effective January 1, 2004].
Practice tipsBy Donald L. ShriverAugust 2003On March 20, 2003, the Fourth District Appellate Court of Illinois decided Rothers Construction, Inc. v. Centurion Industries, Inc., et al., 272 Ill.Dec. 105, 786 NE2d 644.
Recent DUI casesBy Thomas M. Moran & James J. AhernSeptember 2003Recent DUI cases.
Revenue ruling limits related party exchangesBy Suzanne Goldstein BakerSeptember 2003A Revenue Ruling issued by the Internal Revenue Service on November 26, 2002, added a 10-penny nail to the coffin of a certain type of tax-deferred exchange among related parties.