American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 - Nontaxable Unemployment BenefitsApril 2021The federally enacted American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 includes a retroactive provision making the first $10,200 per taxpayer of 2020 unemployment benefits nontaxable for individuals with modified federal adjusted gross income of less than $150,000.
Chair’s Final NoteBy Mary NicolauJune 2021A note from the outgoing chair, Mary Nicolau.
Co-Editors’ NoteBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiDecember 2021An introduction to the issue from the co-editors.
Co-Editors’ NoteBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiNovember 2021An introduction to the issue from the co-editors.
Co-Editors’ NoteBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiOctober 2021An introduction to the issue from the co-editors.
Co-Editors’ NoteBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiSeptember 2021An introduction to the issue from the co-editors, Mary Ann Connelly and Stanley R. Kaminski.
Co-Editors’ NoteBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley KaminskiAugust 2021An introduction to the issue from the editors.
Co-Editors’ NoteBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiJuly 2021An introduction to the issue from the editors.
Co-Editors’ NoteBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiJune 2021An introduction to the issue from the co-editors, Mary Ann Connelly and Stanley R. Kaminski.
Co-Editors’ NoteBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiMay 2021An introduction to the issue from the co-editors, Mary Ann Connelly and Stanley R. Kaminski.
Co-Editors’ NoteBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiApril 2021An introduction to the issue from the co-editors, Mary Ann Connelly and Stanley R. Kaminski.
Co-Editors’ NoteBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiMarch 2021An introduction to the issue from the co-editors, Mary Ann Connelly and Stanley R. Kaminski.
Co-Editors’ NoteBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiFebruary 2021An introduction to the issue from the co-editors, Mary Ann Connelly and Stanley R. Kaminski.
Co-Editors’ NoteBy Mary Ann Connelly & Stanley R. KaminskiJanuary 2021An introduction to the issue from the co-editors, Mary Ann Connelly and Stanley R. Kaminski.
Failing to Properly Terminate State Domicile Has a Taxing ResultBy Stanley R. Kaminski & Lauren A. FerranteJuly 2021As a result of state tax burdens due to the pandemic, it is becoming increasingly common for people now facing higher state taxes on their earnings, profits, and gains—and benefiting from the ability to remotely work from home—to look to permanently move to no- or low-tax states to avoid state taxation.
Guns Save Life, Inc. et al v. Zahra, Ali, Director of the Dep’t of Rev. of Cook County, et al.By David DornerNovember 2021In the recent decision Guns Save Life, Inc. et al v. Zahra, Ali, Director of the Dep’t of Rev. of Cook County, et al., the Illinois Supreme Court considered whether a Cook County tax ordinance imposing county tax on the retail purchase of firearms and firearms ammunition violated the Illinois Constitution.
Illinois Appellate Court Affirms ‘Glaring Bad Faith’ Standard Applies in FCA LawsuitBy Lauren FerranteMay 2021A summary and analysis of State of Illilnois ex rel. Thulis v. City of Chicago, which looked at whether the city violated the Illinois False Claims Act by knowingly failing to comply with the Revised Uniform Unclaimed Property Act due to its failure to report or turn over more than 22,000 uncased checks to the state.
Illinois Makes Significant Changes to Tax CodeBy Adam P. Beckerink, Laura Grace Mezher, & Colleen M. ReddenAugust 2021Among the bills Governor Pritzker signed into law on June 17 was S.B. 2017, the state budge bill, which contains several provisions intended to raise revenue.
Sourcing of TPP: When Destination and Delivery DovetailBy Stanley R. Kaminski & Lauren A. FerranteMarch 2021The sourcing of the sales of tangible personal property is a hot topic and one that surprises practitioners with its various twists and turns.
Wendella Sightseeing Company, Inc. v. City of Chicago: Part 2By Stanley R. KaminskiOctober 2021A summary and analysis of Wendella Sightseeing Company, Inc. v. City of Chicago, in which a sightseeing boat business challenged the expansion of the Chicago Amusement Tax.