ISBA Development Site
This website is for ISBA staff use only. All visitors should return to the main ISBA website.
This website is for ISBA staff use only. All visitors should return to the main ISBA website.
Under Rule 1.9(a), a lawyer who had previously represented a medical group in defending against medical malpractice claims may not subsequently represent a client in asserting a medical malpractice claim against a physician who is a member of the medical group if the matters are the same or substantially related, unless the former client provides informed consent. Even if there is no conflict under Rule 1.9, the lawyer should not use or reveal confidential information relating to the former representation except as otherwise permitted under IRPC 1.9(c).
A lawyer who represents the second wife in obtaining child support for her two young children from a former husband has a conflict of interest with the first wife of the same husband under Rule 1.9 because of his previous representation of the first wife in obtaining child support from that same husband for her child who is now 15 years old. The lawyer also has a “material interest” conflict under Rule 1.7 in connection with his representation of the second wife in her child support claim. These two Rules require the lawyer to obtain the informed consent of both wives in order to undertake the representation.
A lawyer may represent a client in a matter unrelated to a prior divorce proceeding in which the lawyer represented former client who now may testify against his current client. However, the lawyer may not cross-examine the former client unless it can be done both without using information relating to the prior representation to the disadvantage of the former client and without materially limiting his ability to effectively cross-examine the former client to the detriment of the current litigation client.
Lawyer may represent a beneficiary of a trust in an action against the trustee even though lawyer had previously represented trust, beneficiary and trustee in condemnation suit involving trust property.
Lawyer may represent university as legal counsel even though faculty member with dispute against the university had previously discussed that dispute with the lawyer; provided, however, that the lawyer take appropriate action to avoid being placed in a conflict of interest situation, and , if such a situation develops, that the lawyer follow Rules regarding conflicts.
Representing a client in the same or a related matter as that involving a former client is not improper unless the clients' interests are materially adverse.
An attorney is prohibited from representing a client in a negotiation of a lease against a former client when the representation is of the same or substantially related matter unless the former client consents after disclosure.
Attorney representation of Executor when former client is judgment creditor of Legatee is restricted by Rules
It is professionally improper for an attorney to file an annexation lawsuit against a Village Board when the attorney has obtained confidential information in his previous position as Village Board Attorney regardless of whether this information is disclosed to the general public.