ISBA Development Site
This website is for ISBA staff use only. All visitors should return to the main ISBA website.
This website is for ISBA staff use only. All visitors should return to the main ISBA website.
An Illinois lawyer acting as local counsel for an out-of-state lawyer shares the same duties to the client as the lawyer acting as lead counsel. While local counsel and the client may agree to limit the role of local counsel upon informed consent, that lawyer remains subject to the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct. A lawyer may only enter a general appearance in an Illinois state court criminal matter and is subject to the rules and orders of the court, including any orders requiring local counsel’s appearance at any or all court proceedings.
A lawyer not admitted to practice law in Illinois may not engage in the practice of law in Illinois unless one of the exceptions set forth in Rule 5.5 applies.
Under Rule 1.5(e), a law firm may agree to share fees with a retired partner as part of a retirement agreement. However, Rules 1.5(e) and 5.6 bar the firm from requiring that a lawyer or the lawyer’s new firm continue to share fees with the retired partner after the lawyer has left the firm.
A lawyer who receives compensation in exchange for the referral of clients to an investment advisor has a conflict of interest and is involved in a business transaction with a client. Whether a lawyer can engage in such a transaction must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.
Under Rule 4.2, a lawyer, even one who is acting pro se, is not permitted to have contact with a party who is represented in one aspect of a case and unrepresented in another aspect of the case, without the consent of that party’s lawyer, or the authorization of law or court order.
Lawyers offering or making an employment agreement that restricts the right of an in-house lawyer to practice law after termination of employment, such as through a noncompete provision, do not comply with the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct.
A concurrent conflict of interests exists if a lawyer represents the surviving spouse as the administrator of his deceased spouse’s testate estate and also represents the surviving spouse in renouncing the will and in seeking a spousal award.
The Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct allow a lawyer to provide the executor and trustee named in a deceased client’s estate planning documents with the final executed copies of those documents and whatever portions of the estate planning file may be helpful to the named fiduciary to carry out the deceased client’s intent expressed in those documents.
A law firm seeking to represent the employees of an adverse corporate entity in matters unrelated to the current dispute may do so, but only if the firm determines it can comply with Rule 1.7 and the appropriate parties provide informed consent.
An Illinois lawyer may enter into a fee-sharing agreement with an out-of-state lawyer who refers a personal injury case to the Illinois lawyer so long as the agreement complies with the applicable Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct and the corresponding rules of the foreign jurisdiction.
An employing lawyer or law firm may allow a law school graduate awaiting the bar exam or admission to the bar to perform many of the services normally performed by licensed first year associates, other than appearing in a legal proceeding, provided that the graduate’s work is reviewed by a supervising lawyer who takes responsibility for the work product and that the graduate and employing lawyer or law firm do not make false or misleading statements to clients or others regarding the graduate’s status at the firm.
Rule 1.13 of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct governs when and whether an in-house lawyer is required to report possibly fraudulent conduct of the entity’s employees, officers, or other individuals to higher authorities within the organization and to others outside the organization. Even if such reporting is not required, an in-house lawyer may be permitted to disclose such information within the organization, subject to the lawyer’s obligations to maintain client confidences under IRPC 1.6 and 1.9.
A demand letter written by a lawyer in an attempt to settle a civil claim may accurately set forth the relevant statute including the statute’s possibility of both civil and criminal liability. However, a demand letter should not threaten criminal prosecution in order to gain an advantage in a civil matter. Further, a lawyer should not state that criminal prosecution can be avoided by making payment (settling the claim) because such a statement would be an improper threat.
Lawyers may state or imply that they practice in a partnership only when that is the fact. A law firm’s name may not imply a partnership when none exists. A law firm’s name must not mislead the public. But for limited exceptions, a law firm’s name should not include the name of a non-practicing lawyer. To be of counsel to a firm one must have a continuing and regular relationship with the firm. To practice as a limited liability partnership, the partnership’s name must end with one of several designations prescribed by statute.
A law firm’s utilization of an off-site network administrator to assist in the operation of its law practice will not violate the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct regarding the confidentiality of client information if the law firm makes reasonable efforts to ensure the protection of confidential client information
A lawyer may not enter into a referral arrangement with a real estate company that would require the lawyer to use the real estate company’s affiliated title insurer for the lawyer’s clients as a condition of receiving referrals from the real estate company. Other Illinois and federal law governing the lawyer’s conduct may also apply to the proposed arrangement.
A lawyer may communicate with a current constituent of a represented organization about the subject-matter of the representation without the consent of the organization’s counsel only when the constituent does not (i) supervise, direct or regularly consult with the organization’s lawyer concerning the matter; (ii) have authority to obligate the organization with respect to the matter; or (iii) have acts or omissions in connection with the matter that may be imputed to the organization for purposes of civil or criminal liability. Consent of the organization’s lawyer is not required for
Because state government is not one entity composed of all departments under the jurisdiction of the Governor for purposes of resolving conflict of interest questions, a lawyer may represent one state government agency while representing a private party adverse to another state government agency.
Lawyer may not sell legal practice and continue to practice on a fee representation basis in the same geographic area.
Lawyer may sell tangible assets of law practice and continue to practice subject to proper procedures being followed.
A lawyer is responsible for marketing firm’s conduct that would be in violation of the Rules of professional Conduct if engaged in by a lawyer, if the lawyer orders or ratifies such conduct.
Marketing firm, retained by a law firm, may distribute advertisements promoting the firm to potential clients through the mail, by posting on electronic bulletin boards and by delivering promotions door-to-door, but it may not have personal contact with the recipients in its distribution of the advertisements.
A lawyer may represent a client in a matter unrelated to a prior divorce proceeding in which the lawyer represented former client who now may testify against his current client. However, the lawyer may not cross-examine the former client unless it can be done both without using information relating to the prior representation to the disadvantage of the former client and without materially limiting his ability to effectively cross-examine the former client to the detriment of the current litigation client.
During employment contract negotiations, General Counsel may not directly contact a party known to be represented by another lawyer without the prior consent of that lawyer. The General Counsel is communicating regarding “the subject of the representation with a party the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in that matter” without the prior consent of the lawyer representing the other party thus violating the no-contact rule. Illinois Rule of Professional Conduct 4.2.
A lawyer who mediated a divorce settlement between unrepresented husband and wife may not prepare a proposed judgment of dissolution of marriage, a marriage separation agreement and joint parenting agreement for husband and wife and allow husband and wife to file said documents as pro se litigants.
Non-waivable conflict is created by representation of two clients having divergent interests in property possessed by third-party
A law firm’s name may not imply partnership where no actual partnership arrangement exists. A law firm’s name may not mislead the public. A law firm’s name may not contain the name of a partner who withdraws from the firm to join another law firm. A law firm’s name may contain the name of a retired partner or one who has an “of counsel” relationship to the firm, provided the firm takes reasonable steps to show that partner’s status.
Resolution of the conflict between Supreme Court Rule 714 and Rule 7.4 favors Rule 714 as the more recent. A lawyer may list the certification "Capital Litigation Trial Bar" on letterhead without the disclaimer that "the Supreme Court of Illinois does not recognize certifications of specialties in the practice of law."
A law firm generally has no ethical obligation to file a lawsuit on behalf of a missing client to satisfy an impending statute of limitations. There may be exceptions, however, if the client specifically authorizes the filing of a lawsuit prior to the client’s disappearance and provides the law firm with sufficient information with which a complaint can reasonably be prepared and filed.
Attorney may list non-legal accreditation on attorney business card.
Law firm can properly pay former partner share of contingent fee earned after partner left firm to become State’s Attorney as long as payment is part of separation agreement under Rule 1.5(j) and payment does not violate public policy concerns; former partner’s disqualification from private practice as State’s Attorney does not bar payment to former partner of share of fee earned by firm after partner withdrew when paid as part of separation agreement; former partner sharing fee under Rule 1.5(j) need not retain responsibility for matter, share fee proportionally to service performed,
The responsibilities of lawyers regarding nonlawyer assistants extends to interpreters who are employed or retained by, or associated with a lawyer for the purpose of communicating with hearing impaired clients.
Absent disclosure and consent, a lawyer cannot represent an insurer with regard to a claim where the insurer’s interests are inconsistent with those of a reinsurer on whose Board the lawyer sits.
An attorney may enter into a contingent fee agreement to represent a client in post-judgment proceedings to determine property rights in a dissolution of marriage case where one of the former spouses has died, provided the fee agreement is written and reasonable in amount.
A report to the ARDC is not mandatory under Rule 8.3 unless a lawyer has actual knowledge of a violation of Rules 8.4(a)(3) or (a)(4). A lawyer may report an abuse of the discovery process to the ARDC and may also file a Motion for Sanctions with the trial court.