Not All Risks Are Equal or CompensableBy Victor CerdaWorkers’ Compensation Law, August 2022A summary and analysis of Rodney Buckley v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Comm'n.
Greater Peoria Mass Transit District d/b/a Citylink v. The Illinois Workers’ Compensation Comm’n: An AnalysisBy Deborah BenzingWorkers’ Compensation Law, April 2022In Greater Peoria Mass Transit District d/b/aCitylink v. The Illinois Workers’ Compensation Comm’n, the sole issue presented in the appellate court appeal was whether the Commission properly determined that claimant’s condition of ill-being was causally related to a 2019 work accident.
What Is Needed to Prove Odd-Lot Permanent Total DisabilityBy Brad L. BadgleyWorkers’ Compensation Law, April 2022If an employee’s disability is limited and it is not obvious that the employee is unemployable, the employee may nevertheless demonstrate an entitlement to permanent total disability by proving that he or she fits within the odd-lot category.
Procedural Fumble Allows for Punt on Important Issue: Clifton Armstead v. National Freight, Inc.By Brittany N. MeekerWorkers’ Compensation Law, February 2022The recent Illinois Supreme Court opinion of Clifton Armstead v. National Freight, Inc. further muddies the waters on whether an employee who enters a settlement agreement under a workers’ compensation claim claiming only one type of injury can later come back and assert a third-party claim for a separate injury from the same occurrence.
A Bench PerspectiveBy Justice William E. Holdridge, Ashley Kidd, Hailey Rehberg Witt, & Steven WingerWorkers’ Compensation Law, November 2021Frequently asked questions about the Workers' Compensation Commission.
The View From the Dais/Bench/Desk/TableBy Gerald Napleton & Dennis O’BrienWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2021Arbitrators and judges often face similar problems, though the methods of resolution are not always the same.
Claimant’s Burden of Proof in Premise Fall ClaimsBy Herb FranksWorkers’ Compensation Law, May 2021In Vaughan v. IWCC, the appellate court affirmed the denial of a worker’s claim for benefits resulting from a fall in the employer’s parking lot, finding that the claimant failed to satisfy her burden of proving that the injury arose out of employment.
Mind the Gap: Maroney’s Rule 23 Caution on Causal ConnectionBy Robert FinleyWorkers’ Compensation Law, May 2021In Kevin Maroney v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission, the appellate courtissued and order filed under Supreme Court Rule 23, which provides for precedent in limited circumstances under Rule 23(e)(1).