What Is Required to Prove Entitlement to Odd-Lot Permanent Total Disability BenefitsBy Monica J. KiehlWorkers’ Compensation Law, February 2020In Barnett v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Comm’n, the appellate court issued a Rule 23 order that set forth the burden a claimant must meet in order to show permanent and total disability or entitlement to benefits under an odd-lot theory of permanent total disability benefits.
Multiple Accidents and Section 5(b): What Does the Employer Have to Prove to Recover?By Gregory S. KeltnerWorkers’ Compensation Law, December 2019In Hunt v. Herrod, the third district appellate court found that an employer is not entitled to a lien pursuant to Section 5(b) of the Workers’ Compensation Act merely because it paid workers’ compensation benefits.
Traveling to and From Employer’s Premises in the Context of Slip and Fall InjuriesBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, December 2019As a general rule, when an employee slips and falls at a point off of the employer’s premises while traveling to and from work, the resulting injuries do not arise out of and in the course of the employment and are not compensable under the Act.
‘Estate of Petitioner’ is Not a Proper Party in a Workers’ Compensation ProceedingBy Brad L. BadgleyWorkers’ Compensation Law, October 2019In Illinois State Treasurer v. Estate of Kormany, the circuit court's judgment was vacated and remanded to allow a personal representative of a deceased petitioner’s estate to be substituted as the proper party.
Filing Deadlines and Subject Matter Jurisdiction—How 19(f)(1) Plays It’s RoleBy Matteo RagoWorkers’ Compensation Law, October 2019A summary of Briana Conway v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission, which highlights the importance of a practitioner to adhere to a timely filing and strict compliance of the Workers’ Compensation Act.
The Appellate Court Is Not Afraid to Reverse the IWCC Based Upon Manifest Weight of the EvidenceBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2019In a recent Rule 23 decision, the court held that when utilizing the manifest weight of the evidence standard, the test is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the Commission’s finding and not whether the opposite conslusion might be reached.
Loaned/Borrowed Employee and the Exclusive RemedyBy Richard D. HanniganWorkers’ Compensation Law, September 2019While some employers and insurance companies may bemoan the benefits afforded an injured worker they certainly benefit from sections 1(a)(4) and 5 of the Workers’ Compensation Act.