Annexation agreements: How enforceable are they?By Robin L. PerryMarch 2006The facts in this case are straightforward. On December 15, 1997, Robert W. Gaylor, Joanna A. Gaylor, Robert E. Gaylor and Morna K. Gaylor (hereinafter “Gaylors”) entered into an Annexation Agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”) with the Village of Ringwood, Illinois (hereinafter “Village”) to annex a 23.75 acre parcel of land.
Applicability of the Prevailing Wage Act requirements to private subdivision developers engaged in public worksBy Robert J. Britz & Paula Tipton WallinNovember 2006Municipalities must comply with state statutes such as the Prevailing Wage Act, the Public Construction Bond Act, the Plat Act, and the public bidding requirements of the Illinois Municipal Code when directly contracting for public infrastructure improvements such as roads, sidewalks, sanitary sewers, water improvements, etc.
Architect Selection - Fee InformationBy Phillip B. LenziniJune 2006Commonly, when units of local government in Illinois seek the service of architects and engineers, they would like to obtain, along with other information regarding the architectural or engineering services, firm and credentials, information regarding the fee structure the architects or engineers propose to use.
Attorney General issues opinions affecting units of local governmentBy Lynn PattonApril 2006Under section 4 of the Attorney General Act (15 ILCS 205/4 (West 2004)), the Attorney General is authorized, upon request, to give written legal opinions to state officers and state’s attorneys on matters relating to their official duties.
Case noteBy John H. BrechinDecember 2006Hammond v. Firefighters Pension Fund, No. 2-06-0133 and 2-06-0187 November 29, 2006 The Second District Appellate Court recently reviewed the decision of the Defendant Board to award the Plaintiff a non-duty disability pension and to deny him a line of duty disability pension.
Case noteBy John H. BrechinSeptember 2006The Calibraro case involved a firefighter/paramedic employed by Buffalo Grove who made application for a disability pension.
Case Note: Does a special use permit run with the land? Not this one, says Justice SmithBy Paul N. KellerOctober 2006In an opinion authored by Justice James Fitzgerald Smith, former Des Plaines City Attorney, the Illinois Appellate Court upholds the validity of a special use permit which was intended to apply only to the owner of the land at the time it was issued.
Feret v. Schillerstrom: Second DistrictBy Phillip B. LenziniJune 2006It appears that if an ordinance, resolution or motion is adopted by a governmental body that was not previously listed on the agenda, the corrective step should include an express repeal of the earlier action and a new adoption of the matter properly agendized.
Local governmental entities not entitled to absolute immunity when a hazardous recreational activity is involvedBy Joy A. RobertsOctober 2006On July 5, 2006 the Illinois Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision that when a hazardous recreational activity is involved, local governmental entities and their employees are held to a higher standard of care; therefore, pursuant to section 3-109 of the Tort Immunity Act, they are immune from liability for negligence, but subject to the exceptions found in section 3-109(c) of the Act. Murray v. Chicago Youth Center, et al., 2006 WL 1822656 (Ill. 2006).
A newly recognized defense to disconnection petitionsBy David W. McArdleMarch 2006This article is intended to provide direction for municipalities faced with petitioners seeking disconnection from the municipal corporate limits.
Ownership of property within a TIFBy Kathleen Field OrrOctober 2006An often-ignored standard of the TIF Act is the provision regarding conflicts of interest on the part of certain municipal officials, employees or consultants which may arise in connection with the designation of a Redevelopment Project Area.
Practice and procedure before the Property Tax Appeal BoardBy James W. ChipmanJanuary 2006This article provides an overview of practice and procedure before the State of Illinois Property Tax Appeal Board, highlighting some of the statutes and rules that govern the PTAB’s operation.
Public employees’ free speech rightsBy John H. BrechinJuly 2006The United States Supreme Court on May 30, 2006, issued its decision in Garcetti v. Ceballos involving the question of whether the First Amendment protects a government employee from discipline based on speech made pursuant to and in the course of the employee’s official duties. Ceballos was a Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney who exercised supervisory responsibilities over other lawyers.
Recent decisions of interestBy John H. BrechinMay 2006Plaintiff’s employment as a County Sheriff’s corrections officer was terminated effective May 23, 2003.
Second District limits municipal authority to Recoup Lost Sales Tax RevenueBy Peter FriedmanSeptember 2006In a little-noticed opinion, the Second District significantly restrained municipal authority to recoup sales tax revenue lost to other municipalities able to offer more favorable tax rates for retailers (through tax rebate agreements and/or lower sales tax rates).
Zoning and religious uses—Vision Church v. Village of Long GroveBy John H. BrechinDecember 2006Vision Church was an Illinois religious corporation whose membership totaled approximately 120 persons. Prior to 1999, Vision was located in Park Ridge but began looking for a new church site, and expecting its membership to grow significantly, desired a larger facility.