Cable TV—What should your municipality be doing?By Marty Shanahan, Jr.March 2008The Cable and Video Competition Law of 2007 permits cable service and video service providers to obtain State-issued authorization to provide cable service or video service.
Eminent domain—SWIDA is still alive!By John H. BrechinDecember 2008In the lawsuit prior to City of Chicago v. Midland Smelting Company, the City attempted to acquire Midland’s property through its use of the power of eminent domain.
Eminent domain—Who is an owner?By John H. BrechinOctober 2008The Anderson case involved the issue of who is properly considered an owner in an eminent domain proceeding and thereby entitled to the statutory rights attendant thereto.
Enforceability of contractual severance provisions in the public sectorBy John H. BrechinFebruary 2008In Village of Oak Lawn v. Faber, 1-06-2622, decided December 21, 2007, the 1st District Appellate Court considered whether a severance package offered to Mr. Faber passed legal muster.
A felony does not always mean a forfeiture of pension benefitsBy John H. BrechinSeptember 2008Romano v. Municipal Employees’ Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago involved an appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cook County confirming a decision of the Board of Trustees of the Municipal Employees’ Annuity and Benefit Fund, which found that as a consequence of his conviction of a felony, Romano forfeited all benefits he may have had as a participant in the Municipal Employees’ Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago.
Handbills, soliciting, and the First AmendmentBy John H. BrechinSeptember 2008The lesson of Horina v. City of Granite City is that any regulations on solicitation or other First Amendment activities must be solidly based in fact and law.
The Illinois Public Labor Relations Act—Who is a Supervisor?By John H. BrechinAugust 2008The recent decision of City of Washington v. Illinois Labor Relations Board and Laborers International Union of North America, Local 231 examined this issue again in the context of determining who in the City of Washington’s Public Services Department were properly classified as supervisors.
Indemnification agreements enforceable for municipality’s own negligenceBy Maureen E. RiggsMay 2008On February 29, 2008, in the case of Nicor Gas Co. v. Village of Wilmette, 2008 WL 564138, the First District Appellate Court upheld the validity of indemnification agreements that indemnify a municipality for its own negligence if such agreements are clear and explicit.
The Local Records Act and Destruction of Public RecordsBy Maryann BullionMarch 2008If one of your local government clients deletes an e-mail or throws away a file that contains information that should be considered a public record, they could be charged with a Class 4 felony.
New rules for vacancies in municipal officesBy Jenette M. SchwemlerJanuary 2008House Bill 962 amends the Illinois Municipal Code provisions regarding eligibility for election or appointment and vacancies in elective offices.
The Public Safety Employee Benefits Act – What is an emergency?By John H. BrechinDecember 2008On November 4, 2008, the Second District Appellate Court issued its unanimous opinion upholding benefits for a police officer under the Public Safety Employee Benefits Act.
Recent issues in Illinois liquor laws & enforcementBy Mark C. PalmerJuly 2008Illinois Public Act 92-0503 became effective on January 1, 2002 and enhanced the responsibilities of local liquor commissioners (typically mayors or presidents and their acting deputies) to create underage alcohol (and tobacco) enforcement policies and procedures
Reppert v. SIU: 4th District decision—A commentaryBy Phillip B. LenziniMay 2008Essentially, the decision in the case of Reppert v. Southern Illinois University reversed the trial court’s summary judgment on behalf of SIU in the Freedom of Information Act case seeking release of the employment contracts of several SIU employees.
Tax increment financing in ChicagoBy Leslie HairstonJuly 2008In the firsthand experiences of the author, there appear to be several ways in which the City of Chicago, in its practical utilization of TIF, is failing to adhere to this fundamental purpose for the program and actually may be undermining potential economic development in Chicago’s poorest neighborhoods.
Township Code amendment updateBy Maryann BullionOctober 2008The 95th General Assembly recently made several important changes to the Township Code (hereinafter “Code”).
Wade: The Supreme Court’s final word on Section 3-115 of the Pension CodeBy Carlos S. ArévaloJune 2008This article examines the conflicting interpretations of Section 3-115, namely whether physicians retained by a pension board must all agree and certify that the officer is disabled, or whether it requires that the physicians simply address the issue of the officer’s disability status in their certificates. Finally, this article addresses how the Supreme Court has resolved this conflict in its recent decision of Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension Board.
Zoning vested rightsBy John H. BrechinSeptember 2008The 1st District Appellate Court reviewed the principles of zoning vested rights in an expansive 26-page opinion of Cribbin v. City of Chicago.