Appellate Court does the unusual—reverses arbitratorBy Michael R. LiedOctober 2002Arbitration awards are fairly sacred, because the parties agree to let an arbitrator settle their dispute. However, in Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Teamsters, 280 F.3d 1133 (7th Cir. 2002), the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court's affirmance of an arbitrator's decision in favor of Teamsters Local 744.
California trial adventure (or, How I spent my summer vacation)By Donald R. TracyOctober 2002This past summer, I had the unique experience of trying a jury case in California. The trial was in Modesto, Stanislaus County, the home of Chandra Levy's parents. Congressman Condit is from nearby Ceres.
Circuit City v. Adams: the battle over arbitration agreements rages onBy Glenn R. Gaffney & Justin GaffneyApril 2002In Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, 121 S.Ct. 1302 (2001), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 USC § 1 et seq. is applicable to employment agreements.
Court decides NLRB awarded too much back pay to union saltBy Michael R. LiedJuly 2002Winston Cox was a full-time union organizer for the IBEW. He was refused employment with a non-union contractor and this was found to be an unfair labor practice.
D.C. Circuit upholds NLRB’s extension of Weingarten rights to nonunion workplaceBy Daniel S. AlcornMarch 2002Nonunion employers violate the National Labor Relations Act if they refuse an employee's request for the presence of a co-worker during an investigatory interview which the employee reasonably believes will result in disciplinary action.
Double breasting: how not to run afoul of the lawBy Alan M. KaplanMarch 2002Many companies want to split their operations into two halves--one company with union contracts and one company without union contracts.
Drafting an effective release under the Older Workers Benefit Protection ActBy Bruce C. BealMay 2002The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (29 USC 621) ("ADEA") was amended by the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act ("Act") in 1990 in response to the Supreme Court decision in Public Employee's Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts, 109 S. Ct. 256 (1989).
Employer sues union for defamation related to picketingBy Michael R. LiedDecember 2002In Lowe Excavating Co. v. International Union of Operating Engineer's Local 150, 327 Ill. App. 3d 711 (2d Dist. 2002), the union picketed a non-union employer with signs stating:
Employer’s state law claims relating to labor dispute barred by filing of unfair labor practice chargeBy Michael R. LiedDecember 2002In Overnite Transportation Co. v. International Brotherhood Teamsters, et al, _____ Ill. App. 3d _____, 773 N.E.2d 26, 265 Ill. Dec. 664 (1st Dist. 2002), the Complaint alleged that defendants conspired to commit various tortuous and criminal acts to force the employer to accept the union representation as well as a union contract.
A general guide to employment agreementsBy Alan M. KaplanMarch 2002An employment agreement, like other agreements, creates what every business person wants--certainty. Under American law, parties in a relationship may create their own rules to govern a specific business relationship, as long as the parties meet certain requirements.
ISBA sets ADR program for Midyear meetingDecember 2002The CLE Committee of the ISBA has approved a fantastic program on mediation sponsored jointly by the Alternative Dispute Resolution Section Council, the Bench-Bar Section Council, the Civil Practice Section Council, and the Family Law Section Council set for Thursday, December 12, 2002 from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. at the Chicago Sheridan Hotel during the midyear meeting.
Review of selected 2002 FMLA casesBy Alisa B. ArnoffDecember 2002Scamihorn v. General Truck Drivers, Office, Food & Warehouse Union, 282 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 3/4): Summary judgment for employer denied where genuine issues of material fact existed concerning whether employee's father was capable of self-care and of doing his essential job functions.
Seventh Circuit clarifies standards for the grant or denial of summary judgment in retaliation casesBy Michael R. LiedMay 2002In Stone v. City of Indianapolis Public Utilities Division, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2523 (7th Cir. 2002), the court of appeals set forth standards for the grant or denial of summary judgment in cases alleging retaliation for filing a discrimination charge or engaging in some other protected activity.
Seventh Circuit—still paramour-friendlyBy Alisa B. ArnoffDecember 2002The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in mid-September, affirmed its practice of refusing to recognize "paramour claims" in the context of Title VII sexual discrimination lawsuits.
Supreme Court clarifies Americans With Disabilities ActBy Michael R. LiedJuly 2002A Toyota Motor Company employee claimed to be disabled from performing assembly line duties by virtue of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and other impairments.
Supreme Court extends reach of hostile environment claimsBy Jill P. O’Brien & David ManjarresOctober 2002Earlier this year the Supreme Court issued an important decision limiting the period of time in which a plaintiff may complain of discrete acts of discrimination, but extends the time period in which a plaintiff may complain of a hostile environment.