Ahmad v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, — Ill. App. 3d ___. 847 N.E.2d 810 (1st Dist. 2006)By J.A. SebastianJuly 2006The Board of Education of the City of Chicago (“Board”) terminated Rita Ahmad (“Ahmad”), a tenured public school teacher, who then filed a complaint for administrative review pursuant to the Illinois Administrative Review Law, 735 ILCS 5/3-101 through 5-3-113, as provided in the Illinois School Code at 105 ILCS 5/24-16.
Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to address electronic discoveryBy Michael D. GiffordJuly 2006On April 12, 2006, the United States Supreme Court approved and forwarded to Congress certain revisions to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure addressing preservation and discovery of data in electronic media, sometimes known as e-discovery.
Election Code changes affect Illinois employersBy Isham R. Jones, IIIJanuary 20062006 is an election year in Illinois and two recent changes in the Illinois Election Code will make it easier for workers to perform their civic duty. Both changes became effective on August 22, 2005.
Employee destroys computer files and violates Computer Fraud and Abuse ActBy Michael R. LiedJuly 2006In International Airport Centers, L.L.C., et al., v. Jacob Citrin, 440 F.3d 418 (7th Cir. 2006), Citrin was employed to identify properties that IAC might want to acquire, and to assist in any later acquisitions. IAC provided Citrin a laptop to use to record data that he collected in the course of his work.
Employee dress and grooming policiesBy Michael R. LiedAugust 2006Recently, the full Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, often considered a fairly liberal Court, rejected a plaintiff’s claim that the employer’s requirement that she wear makeup constituted sex discrimination.
Employee must arbitrate retaliatory discharge claimBy Michael R. LiedJuly 2006Joann Melena joined Anheuser-Busch as a nonunion employee at its distribution center in Mt. Vernon, Illinois in February 1999.
Employer liability for harassment by non-employeesBy Stephen E. BaloghMarch 2006In 1998, the Supreme Court told us that an employer would be liable, pursuant to Title VII, for conduct of its employee which creates an actionable hostile work environment.
Faulty release fails to bar age discrimination claimsBy Michael R. LiedJanuary 2006In Kruchowski, et al. v. Weyerhaeuser Co., the group of plaintiffs signed a release of claims, in order to obtain a severance package.
Mandatory arbitration clauses in employee manualsBy Jon D. McLaughlinDecember 2006A recent National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) decision suggests that employers should review materials that they have distributed to their employees concerning mandatory arbitration.
New VESSA rules announcedBy Michael R. LiedJuly 2006The Victim’s Economic Security and Safety Act (“VESSA”) allows for up to 12 weeks for unpaid leave in a 12-month period to allow employees or household members who are the victims of domestic or sexual violence to take time off to pursue such matters as court hearings, counseling, relocating, and seeking medical or legal services to insure the victim’s safety.
NLRB decides successorship issuesBy Michael R. LiedSeptember 2006In Planned Building Services, Inc., 347 NLRB No. 64, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) considered what it describes as two significant issues: (1) the appropriate analytical framework to be applied in determining whether an alleged successor employer has unlawfully refused to hire its predecessor’s employees to avoid a bargaining obligation; and (2) the appropriate make-whole remedy when a successor employer discriminatorily denies employment to its predecessor’s employees and violates its duty to bargain by unilaterally setting initial terms and conditions of employment.
NLRB issues major ruling on supervisory statusBy Keri A. LeggDecember 2006In a major decision just issued, Oakwood Healthcare, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) clarified the guidelines for determining whether an individual is a supervisor under the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”).
No workers’ compensation benefits for injury at company-sponsored picnicBy Michael R. LiedSeptember 2006Allstate Insurance planned a company picnic for July 21, 2000. The picnic occurred on Allstate’s grounds, it was attended exclusively by Allstate employees, and Allstate provided all the materials and equipment.
Proposed rule provides employer guidance on Social Security “No-Match” lettersBy Michael R. LiedAugust 2006Employers annually send the Social Security Administration (SSA) millions of earnings reports (W-2 Forms) in which the combination of employee name and social security number (SSN) does not match SSA records.
Supreme Court makes retaliation claims more dangerous for employersBy Michael R. LiedAugust 2006Claims of retaliation have been increasing in recent years. For example, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has received more than 22,000 charges alleging retaliation in each of the last five years.
Union violated labor law by photographing employeesBy Michael R. LiedSeptember 2006Randell Warehouse of Arizona, Inc., 347 NLRB No. 56 (“Randell II”), presented the issue of whether a union’s unexplained photographing of employees while union representatives distributed campaign literature to them prior to an election constituted objectionable conduct.
What happened in Vegas is not staying in VegasBy Darrell SteinbergMarch 2006The labor relations world is becoming aware of what Las Vegas already knows—that “card check” neutrality agreements are the new world order for union organizing.