Inconsistent assertions regarding disabilities made in ADA complaints and in applications for disability benefitsBy Paul E. FreehlingOctober 2005As a consequence of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Cleveland v. Policy Management Sys. Corp., 526 U.S. 795 (1999), discussed below, an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuit plaintiff who also has filed one or more applications for disability benefits clearly is required to explain the apparent inconsistency between (a) statements on the application(s) that the applicant is unable to work, and (b) allegations in the ADA complaint that the plaintiff is able to perform the job’s essential functions.
The MMPI-Medical examination or not?By Lorna K. GeilerJuly 2005In a recent case, Karraker v. Rent-A-Center, 2005 W.L. 1389443 (7th Cir. 2005), the use of the Minnesota Multi-Phasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) was addressed by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.
New Illinois workplace legislationBy Michael D. GiffordOctober 2005The Illinois General Assembly has imposed several new mandates on employers during this past legislative session.
Proposed unemployment changes could economically benefit lawyersFebruary 2005As per the request of Ole Bly Pace III, the following is the "practical idea" which would help members of the Labor and Employment Law Section to improve their earning power as lawyers:
Retaliatory discharges and citizen crime-fightersBy Paul E. FreehlingJuly 2005An at-will employee observes what she believes to be misconduct harmful to the employer, and she "blows the whistle" internally.
“Similar” is not “equal”-Or is it? Equal pay issuesBy Michael R. LiedFebruary 2005Sandra Wheatley was the director of the Wicomico County, Maryland, Emergency Services Department, and Jane Grogan was the deputy director.
Wachovia Corporation will pay $5.5M for compensation discriminationBy Michael R. LiedFebruary 2005The United States Department of Labor, Office of the Federal Contract Compliance Programs, undertook a corporate management review of the headquarters of First Union National Bank in Charlotte, North Carolina.
What is adverse to one may not be adverse to all in retaliation casesBy Kathryn WoodwardOctober 2005In Washington v. Illinois Department of Revenue, 2005 WL 2000986 (7th Cir. 2005, August 22, 2005), the Seventh Circuit reversed a grant of summary judgment in favor of the employer, finding that switching an employee’s hours, but not position or rate of pay, may constitute an adverse action.
When a performance evaluation is the product of discrimination, has there been an “adverse employment action”?By Paul E. FreehlingJuly 2005For over a decade, the federal judiciary has been grappling with the following question: Under what circumstances, if any, does a less-than-stellar performance evaluation given as a result of unlawful discrimination constitute "adverse employment action" as contemplated by the anti-discrimination statutes and the Due Process Clause of the 5th and 14th Amendments?
Work authorization updatesBy Michael R. LiedFebruary 2005All employers must ensure proper completion of the Employment Eligibility Verification form (Form I-9) for each newly hired employee, including U.S. citizens and aliens.